Michael Mmoh vs Edan Leshem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Leshem analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Edan Leshem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 46.54% of points on his second serve, while Leshem has won 38.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 47.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Leshem has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.1% and 34.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 61.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leshem has saved 46.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.72% of matches played (W/L 29/ 24), with Leshem winning 47.37% (W/L 9/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mmoh winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mmoh winning 2 and Leshem winning 0. The last match between Mmoh and Leshem was at the Columbus Challenger, 18-09-2019, Second, I.hard with Michael Mmoh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:51.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mmoh and Leshem have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mmoh winning 0 times and Leshem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mmoh winning 1, and Leshem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 250.4 while Leshem has played against players with an average rank of 191.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leshem has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 42.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leshem has converted 48.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mmoh 1 - 0 Leshem
11
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
125
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
800
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
9
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
58% (284-204)
Career Total W/L
58% (308-220)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$1,164,400
Career Prize Money
$26,870
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Michael Mmoh | Edan Leshem |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 14 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 2:7:51 | 2:7:51 |
1st Serve % | 72% (58/81) | 52% (43/83) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (40/58) | 63% (27/43) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (11/23) | 53% (21/40) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 43% (3/7) |
Return Points W% | 42% (35/83) | 37% (30/81) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 7-6(5) |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michael Mmoh | Edan Leshem |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 42% (14/19) | 25% (2/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (155/163) | 45% (33/40) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (3/6) | 25% (1/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.52 | 0 |
Aces Total | 80 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.32 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 49 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:47 | 1:27:23 |
Avg Opp Rank | 201.33 | 119 |
1st Serve % | 65% (655/1007) | 66% (159/240) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (471/655) | 58% (93/159) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (158/352) | 38% (31/81) |
BPs Won% Total | 50% (34/68) | 48% (14/29) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (338/959) | 42% (93/219) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 33% (1/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (5/14) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
19
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ben Shelton
Player
Michael Mmoh
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
27 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
3 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Emilio Nava
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
17
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Alexandre Muller
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H |
view more