Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Mmoh vs Tennys Sandgren Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mmoh vs Sandgren analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Mmoh vs Tennys Sandgren Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mmoh has won 47.19% of points on his second serve, while Sandgren has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mmoh, in recent form, has won 48.01% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sandgren has won 48.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.49% and 27.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mmoh has saved 62.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sandgren has saved 65% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mmoh has won 54.39% of matches played (W/L 31/ 26), with Sandgren winning 53.57% (W/L 30/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mmoh has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 65/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 11/ 14). Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/ 175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10).
- Player level: In the last year, Mmoh has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 14/ 11), where as Sandgren has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 9 times before with Mmoh winning 5 times. They have played 21 sets in total, with Mmoh winning 10 and Sandgren winning 11. The last match between Mmoh and Sandgren was at the Truist Atlanta Open - Atlanta, 22-07-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Michael Mmoh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:43.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mmoh and Sandgren have played a deciding set 2 times, with Mmoh winning 2 times and Sandgren 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Mmoh winning 3, and Sandgren 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mmoh has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.46 while Sandgren has played against players with an average rank of 278.11.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mmoh has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sandgren has won 39% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mmoh has converted 41.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sandgren has converted 30.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mmoh 5 - 4 Sandgren
111
Rank
81
High
26
Age
R
Plays
5
Total4
3
Hard2
0
Clay0
2
Indoor1
0
Grass1
264
Rank
41
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
58% (286-206)
Career Total W/L
56% (420-324)
42% (8-11)
YTD W/L
60% (12-8)
$1,164,400
Career Prize Money
$2,256,263
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 5 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 10 | 11 |
| Games Won | 97 | 101 |
| Aces (Total) | 47 | 69 |
| DFs (Total) | 30 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:43 | 1:43:43 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (392/615) | 66% (413/623) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (278/392) | 70% (290/413) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (101/223) | 50% (105/210) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (22/51) | 44% (25/57) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (228/623) | 38% (236/615) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 57% (7/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 43% (7/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(8) 6-4 |
Stats 
Michael Mmoh
Player
Tennys Sandgren
59%
(
66 of
111)
1st Serve %
77%
(
73 of
95)
12
Aces
19
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
55 of
73)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
27 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Tennys Sandgren
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Mmoh
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
10
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Mmoh
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-4 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Mmoh
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
51
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 7-6(1) |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Tennys Sandgren
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
104)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(5) 2-0 ret. |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Tennys Sandgren
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
7
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Mmoh | Tennys Sandgren |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 42% (8/11) | 60% (12/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 46% (19/22) | 62% (31/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (194/197) | 53% (272/238) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.89 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 221 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 58 | 58 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:8 | 1:55:49 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 181.84 | 300.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (809/1247) | 60% (961/1606) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (580/809) | 78% (747/961) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (203/438) | 51% (329/645) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (43/96) | 32% (47/146) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (438/1207) | 35% (575/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 64% (7/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 59% (10/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 60% (12/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (2/8) | 62% (8/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 20% (1/5) | 30% (3/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Michael Mmoh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Michael Mmoh
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Michael Mmoh
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve %
63%
(
19 of
30)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
4 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Michael Mmoh
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
19
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Michael Mmoh
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Michael Mmoh
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Michael Mmoh
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 1-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Thanasi Kokkinakis
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve %
39%
(
7 of
18)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
19
Total Points Won
8
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Tennys Sandgren Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Tennys Sandgren
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
113
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Martin Damm
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tennys Sandgren
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
43%
(
52 of
120)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
53 of
120)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Stefan Kozlov
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Dmitry Popko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
32 of
68)
7
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
10
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Tennys Sandgren
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
12
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
0
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Tennys Sandgren
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
13
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
10
88%
(
38 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
18 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mmoh Vs Sandgren Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
