Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Shaw vs James Mackinlay Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shaw vs Mackinlay analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Shaw vs James Mackinlay Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shaw has won 47.34% of points on his second serve, while Mackinlay has won 45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shaw, in recent form, has won 44.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mackinlay has won 44.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.02% and 27.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shaw has saved 56.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mackinlay has saved 52.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shaw has won 55.81% of matches played (W/L 24/ 19), with Mackinlay winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shaw has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 42/ 33), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Mackinlay has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Shaw has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.81% of matches (W/L 24/ 19), where as Mackinlay has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shaw winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shaw winning 2 and Mackinlay winning 0. The last match between Shaw and Mackinlay was at the M25 Aldershot, 14-08-2022, Q1 round, Hard with Michael Shaw getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shaw and Mackinlay have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shaw winning 0 times and Mackinlay 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shaw winning 0, and Mackinlay 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shaw has played against opponents with an average rank of 171.98 while Mackinlay has played against players with an average rank of 54.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shaw has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mackinlay has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shaw has converted 46.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mackinlay has converted 36.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shaw 1 - 0 Mackinlay
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
52% (85-79)
Career Total W/L
35% (13-24)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Shaw | James Mackinlay |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 58% (38/65) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (22/29) | 45% (17/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (10/15) | 52% (14/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (34/65) | 27% (12/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Michael Shaw
Player
James Mackinlay
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Shaw | James Mackinlay |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (20/16) | 20% (1/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (187/179) | 38% (21/34) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 33 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:22 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 183.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (417/671) | 59% (39/66) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (286/417) | 69% (27/39) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (119/254) | 48% (13/27) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (24/48) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (251/676) | 36% (27/75) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 63% (10/6) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (10/16) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Michael Shaw Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Michael Shaw
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Gheorghe Claudiu Schinteie
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Rocha
Player
Michael Shaw
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(4) 6-2 12-10 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Michael Shaw
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Shaw
Player
Daniel Lara Salmeron
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 2-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Michael Shaw
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
James Mackinlay Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-0 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
James Mackinlay
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
James Mackinlay
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
26 of
38)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Siim Troost
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
David Stevenson
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
16
4
Double Faults
5
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
39 of
48)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
24 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
23 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 6-7(4) 10-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Ioannis Stamatopoulos
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Phoenix Weir
Player
James Mackinlay
65%
(
74 of
113)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Mackinlay
Player
Francesco Paschetto
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martim Simoes
Player
James Mackinlay
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Shaw Vs Mackinlay Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
