Miho Kuramochi vs Alana Subasic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kuramochi vs A. Subasic

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuramochi 1 - 0 Subasic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Miho Kuramochi winning 2 and Alana Subasic winning 0. The last match between Miho Kuramochi and Alana Subasic was at the W35 Burnie, 19-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Miho Kuramochi getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Kuramochi | 1 |
Subasic | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Burnie(02-19-25)
M. Kuramochi vs A. Subasic H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
60.00% (156-104) | Career Total W/L | 59.49% (47-32) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
2 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Kuramochi vs A. Subasic Match Preview:
According to recent form, the second serve performance of Subasic and Kuramochi has been quite close. Subasic has won 41.56% of points on their second serve, while Kuramochi has won 42.17%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions.
Looking at return game statistics, Subasic has exhibited a solid performance in recent form. They have won 54.45% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, Kuramochi has shown even greater proficiency by winning 59% of such points. Similarly, when it comes to first serve returns, Subasic has managed to win 34.12% of these opportunities, while Kuramochi has a success rate of 41.53%. These return game stats hold significant importance in determining the favorite for this head-to-head matchup.
An analysis of their ability to handle pressure situations reveals that Subasic has successfully saved 53.41% of breakpoints in recent form. In comparison, Kuramochi has managed to save 49.59% of such situations. This particular statistic proves to be quite useful in making in-game betting predictions.
Examining their overall performance over the last year, Subasic has a win percentage of 36.84%, with 7 wins and 12 losses. On the other hand, Kuramochi has fared better with a win percentage of 53.73%, boasting 36 wins and 31 losses. These figures provide a comprehensive prediction overview for their head-to-head matchup.
When it comes to their preferred playing surfaces, Subasic excels on grass courts, winning 50% of matches played on this surface. However, their performance on clay is less favorable, with a 0% win rate. For Kuramochi, clay courts prove to be their best surface, securing a 66% win rate, while indoor hard courts are their weakest, with a 50% win rate.
Considering the level of play, Subasic has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments of value greater than $10K. They have managed to win 41.18% of matches in this category. On the other hand, Kuramochi has also competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments of value greater than $10K, with a higher success rate of 54.84%. Hence, when comparing the statistics between the players to determine the favorite, it is crucial to take into account the level of the events they have been playing in.
Assessing the quality of their opponents, Subasic has faced players with an average rank of 330.32 over the past 12 months. In contrast, Kuramochi has encountered opponents with an average rank of 442.93.
When it comes to deciding sets, Subasic has won 33% of such sets in the last year, which can be a valuable insight for live predictions and betting. Conversely, Kuramochi has a higher success rate of 42% in all matches played on the tour.
While past player performance is useful in predicting tennis matches, the analysis of current event stats is equally important, especially to identify players who are in good form. It is advisable to check the section below (Event Stats) to get an indication of how the players have performed in the current event. Additionally, considering that certain players excel in specific events, this factor should also be taken into account when determining the outcome.
Break point conversion rates can provide valuable insights for in-game live betting. Subasic has converted 42.31% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Kuramochi has demonstrated slightly higher efficiency by converting 46.34% of chances to break their opponent's serve.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as a good starting point. (Warning: Only for statistics enthusiasts)
Miho Kuramochi vs Alana Subasic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kuramochi vs A. Subasic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 5 |
2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:35:23 | Average Match Time | 1:35:23 |
74% (56/76) | 1st Serve % | 51% (25/49) |
55% (31/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
70% (7/10) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
67% (33/49) | Return Points Win % | 49% (37/76) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kuramochi Recent Matches Played
A. Subasic Recent Matches Played

M. Kuramochi vs A. Subasic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60.00% (156/104) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.49% (47/32) |
59.83% (353/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.96% (102/71) |
54.78% (2842/2346) | Games Win/Loss | 53.88% (840/719) |
58.29% (109/78) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (45/27) |
65.52% (19/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
64.10% (25/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60.00% (3/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
76 | Aces Total | 52 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.4 |
714 | Total Double Faults | 302 |
1:36:18 | Average Match Time | 1:25:25 |
431.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.71 |
73% (10823/14928) | 1st Serve % | 66% (3049/4653) |
58% (6256/10823) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (1776/3049) |
43% (1784/4105) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (698/1604) |
51% (1062/2093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (337/682) |
49% (7335/15015) | Return Points Win % | 50% (2371/4735) |
0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
55.48% (86/69) | Challenger W/L | 37.93% (11/18) |
67.31% (70/34) | Futures W/L | 73.47% (36/13) |
61% (155/254) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (43/75) |
0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
49% (20/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
46% (33/71) | Deciding Set Win % | 35% (6/17) |
88% (157/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (49/43) |
11% (157/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (49/6) |
18% (103/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (30/4) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
