Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mikhail Korovin vs Oliver Varga-toth Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Korovin vs Varga-toth analysis and find out who is favored!
Mikhail Korovin vs Oliver Varga-toth Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Korovin has won 51.43% of points on his second serve, while Varga-toth has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Korovin, in recent form, has won 39.73% of his opponent's second serve points, while Varga-toth has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Korovin has saved 65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Varga-toth has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Korovin has won 75% of matches played (W/L 3/ 1), with Varga-toth winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Korovin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 166/ 130), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Varga-toth has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Korovin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 3/ 1), where as Varga-toth has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Korovin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Varga-toth has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Korovin has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Varga-toth has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Korovin has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Varga-toth has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Korovin 0 - 0 Varga-toth
N/A
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Korovin VS Varga-toth H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mikhail Korovin | Oliver Varga-toth |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 5 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (154/224) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (101/154) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (36/70) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (8/20) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (77/195) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
Mikhail Korovin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Philip Henning
Player
Mikhail Korovin
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
85%
(
22 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Pijus Vaitiekunas
65%
(
55 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Korovin
Player
Geni Inoue
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 5-7 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Mikhail Korovin
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Mikhail Korovin
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Mikhail Korovin
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Oliver Varga-toth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Antonio Caruso
Player
Oliver Varga-Toth
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Korovin Vs Varga-toth Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
