Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Milan Welte vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welte vs Findel-Hawkins analysis and find out who is favored!
Milan Welte vs Jack Findel-Hawkins Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welte has won 52.07% of points on his second serve, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welte, in recent form, has won 57.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.08% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welte has saved 51.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Findel-Hawkins has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welte has won 65.79% of matches played (W/L 25/ 13), with Findel-Hawkins winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welte has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 15/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Findel-Hawkins has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 10/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Welte has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13), where as Findel-Hawkins has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welte winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welte winning 2 and Findel-Hawkins winning 0. The last match between Welte and Findel-Hawkins was at the M15 Forbach, 26-09-2019, Second, Carpet with Milan Welte getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:9:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welte and Findel-Hawkins have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welte winning 0 times and Findel-Hawkins 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welte winning 0, and Findel-Hawkins 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welte has played against opponents with an average rank of 62.84 while Findel-Hawkins has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welte has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Findel-Hawkins has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welte has converted 42.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Findel-Hawkins has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welte 1 - 0 Findel-Hawkins
873
Rank
863
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
635
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
54% (83-71)
Career Total W/L
59% (70-49)
75% (9-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Welte VS Findel-Hawkins H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Milan Welte | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:0 | 1:9:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (36/53) | 61% (33/54) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (24/36) | 58% (19/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (12/17) | 43% (9/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (26/54) | 32% (17/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Welte VS Findel-Hawkins H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Milan Welte | Jack Findel-Hawkins |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (154/119) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (256/420) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (169/256) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (90/164) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (13/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (167/440) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Milan Welte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Milan Welte
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Ron Ellouck
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
43 of
50)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 5-7 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Milan Welte
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Findel-Hawkins Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Martins Rocens
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Findel-Hawkins
Player
Daniel Labrador
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Seelig
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
84%
(
49 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Lebedev
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
7
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Jack Findel-Hawkins
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Welte Vs Findel-Hawkins Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
