Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Milan Welte vs Markus Eriksson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welte vs Eriksson analysis and find out who is favored!
Milan Welte vs Markus Eriksson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welte has won 52.07% of points on his second serve, while Eriksson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welte, in recent form, has won 57.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Eriksson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.08% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welte has saved 51.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eriksson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welte has won 65.79% of matches played (W/L 25/ 13), with Eriksson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welte has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 15/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Eriksson has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 258/ 182), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 75/ 68).
- Player level: In the last year, Welte has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13), where as Eriksson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welte winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welte winning 2 and Eriksson winning 0. The last match between Welte and Eriksson was at the M25 Meerbusch, 15-04-2021, Second, Clay with Milan Welte getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welte and Eriksson have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welte winning 0 times and Eriksson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welte winning 0, and Eriksson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welte has played against opponents with an average rank of 62.84 while Eriksson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welte has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eriksson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welte has converted 42.37% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eriksson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welte 1 - 0 Eriksson
873
Rank
863
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
277
High
34
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
54% (83-71)
Career Total W/L
57% (405-310)
75% (9-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$500
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Milan Welte | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:0 | 1:21:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (38/52) | 75% (38/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (22/38) | 47% (18/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (10/14) | 38% (5/13) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (28/51) | 38% (20/52) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Milan Welte
Player
Markus Eriksson
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Milan Welte | Markus Eriksson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (154/119) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 16 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (256/420) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (169/256) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (90/164) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (13/35) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (167/440) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Milan Welte Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Milan Welte
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Milan Welte
Player
Ron Ellouck
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
43 of
50)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 5-7 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Filip
Player
Milan Welte
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Markus Eriksson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Ryan James Storrie
Player
Markus Eriksson
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Jonas Trinker
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
Ioannis Stamoulos
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Eriksson
Player
William Ma
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Markus Eriksson
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
66 of
101)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Escoffier
Player
Markus Eriksson
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Markus Eriksson
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
46 of
66)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
25 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonathan Mridha
Player
Markus Eriksson
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
27 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roman Andres Burruchaga
Player
Markus Eriksson
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Wojciech Marek
Player
Markus Eriksson
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Welte Vs Eriksson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
