Milan Welte vs Matic Dimic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Welte vs Dimic analysis and find out who is favored!
Milan Welte vs Matic Dimic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Welte has won 50.3% of points on his second serve, while Dimic has won 45.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Welte, in recent form, has won 58.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dimic has won 56.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.03% and 31.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Welte has saved 55.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dimic has saved 61.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Welte has won 65.79% of matches played (W/L 25/ 13), with Dimic winning 53.85% (W/L 21/ 18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Welte has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 15/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 10/ 13). Dimic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 47/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Welte has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.79% of matches (W/L 25/ 13), where as Dimic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 21/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Welte winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Welte winning 0 and Dimic winning 2. The last match between Welte and Dimic was at the M15 Dubrovnik, 06-04-2022, First, Clay with Matic Dimic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Welte and Dimic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Welte winning 0 times and Dimic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Welte winning 0, and Dimic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Welte has played against opponents with an average rank of 62.84 while Dimic has played against players with an average rank of 62.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Welte has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dimic has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Welte has converted 47.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dimic has converted 41.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Welte 0 - 1 Dimic
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
873
Rank
863
High
22
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
54% (83-71)
Career Total W/L
50% (66-66)
75% (9-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Milan Welte | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 8 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) | 69% (46/67) |
1st Serve Win% | 59% (22/37) | 72% (33/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (17/30) | 52% (11/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 11% (1/9) | 67% (4/6) |
Return Points W% | 34% (23/67) | 42% (28/67) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-5 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Milan Welte
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Milan Welte | Matic Dimic |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 71% (20/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 56% (154/119) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
DFs Total | 16 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (256/420) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 66% (169/256) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 55% (90/164) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (13/35) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (167/440) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (9/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 89% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Milan Welte Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Milan Welte
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
88)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Milan Welte
Player
Ron Ellouck
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
0
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
43 of
50)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
29 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
108
|
2-6 7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 5-7 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jakub Filip
Player
Milan Welte
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
92)
7
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
105
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Matic Dimic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Louis Wessels
Player
Matic Dimic
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Adam Jones
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Abdulhamid Mubarak
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petr Nesterov
Player
Matic Dimic
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Julian Desousa
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Moritz Schroeter
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Bor Artnak
Player
Matic Dimic
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Boris Butulija
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Dimic
Player
Ammar Elamin
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Matic Dimic
Player
Luciano Barbarino
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more