Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Learner Tien Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kecmanovic vs Tien analysis and find out who is favored!
Miomir Kecmanovic vs Learner Tien Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kecmanovic has won 53.42% of points on his second serve, while Tien has won 53.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kecmanovic, in recent form, has won 50.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tien has won 55.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.58% and 39.81% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kecmanovic has saved 57.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tien has saved 68% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kecmanovic has won 41.82% of matches played (W/L 23/ 32), with Tien winning 77.5% (W/L 31/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kecmanovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 115/ 72), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15). Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Kecmanovic has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 16/ 18), where as Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kecmanovic winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kecmanovic winning 3 and Tien winning 1. The last match between Kecmanovic and Tien was at the U.S. Open - New York, 30-08-2022, First, Hard with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kecmanovic and Tien have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kecmanovic winning 0 times and Tien 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kecmanovic winning 0, and Tien 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kecmanovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.71 while Tien has played against players with an average rank of 111.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kecmanovic has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tien has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kecmanovic has converted 40.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tien has converted 50.32% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kecmanovic 1 - 0 Tien
66
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
432
Rank
421
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
58% (276-203)
Career Total W/L
67% (46-23)
43% (9-12)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$3,685,760
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kecmanovic VS Tien H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:0 | 2:24:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (63/103) | 67% (74/111) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (48/63) | 66% (49/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (22/40) | 38% (14/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (48/111) | 32% (33/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Kecmanovic VS Tien H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Learner Tien
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
111)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Miomir Kecmanovic | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 43% (9/12) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (24/32) | 56% (9/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (271/287) | 57% (87/66) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 94 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.67 | 104.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1093/1722) | 61% (301/493) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (743/1093) | 66% (200/301) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (339/629) | 54% (104/192) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (56/146) | 57% (28/49) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (651/1787) | 44% (207/471) |
| Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (6/17) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Miomir Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
67%
(
68 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
David Goffin
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
38 of
50)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Matteo Berrettini
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
70%
(
87 of
124)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
124)
116
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
12
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
95%
(
37 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Daniel Altmaier
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
104)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Learner Tien
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Learner Tien
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Marco Trungelliti
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Learner Tien
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Robert Cash
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kecmanovic Vs Tien Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Miomir Kecmanovic
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
