Mirza Basic vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Basic vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Mirza Basic vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basic has won 53.26% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basic, in recent form, has won 51.17% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 52.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.52% and 25.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basic has saved 43.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basic has won 57.89% of matches played (W/L 22/ 16), with Ilkel winning 39.13% (W/L 18/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 139/ 101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 15/ 9), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 12/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Basic winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Basic winning 6 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Basic and Ilkel was at the Split 1 Challenger, 06-04-2021, First, Clay with Mirza Basic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:27:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Basic and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Basic winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Basic winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basic has played against opponents with an average rank of 322.66 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 251.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basic has converted 46.97% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Basic 3 - 0 Ilkel
10
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
1
Main
7
Minor
694
Rank
74
High
32
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
56% (461-359)
Career Total W/L
57% (399-307)
50% (4-4)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$478,883
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mirza Basic | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
Games Won | 40 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 15 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:6 | 1:27:6 |
1st Serve % | 67% (139/206) | 62% (123/198) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (105/139) | 72% (88/123) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (38/67) | 44% (33/75) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (8/17) | 7% (1/14) |
Return Points W% | 39% (77/198) | 31% (63/206) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-3 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
3-6 6-2 6-3 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
6-2 6-2 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mirza Basic | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (4/4) | 47% (7/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 42% (14/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (88/84) | 46% (136/160) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.55 | 0.53 |
Aces Total | 47 | 76 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 16 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:49 | 1:25:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 222.75 | 194.87 |
1st Serve % | 67% (340/509) | 58% (510/882) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (238/340) | 71% (363/510) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (84/169) | 46% (170/372) |
BPs Won% Total | 52% (23/44) | 44% (27/62) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (205/536) | 37% (318/859) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 43% (3/7) | 43% (6/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Szymon Kielan
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Mirza Basic
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Mirza Basic
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
16
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
46 of
55)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Andrea Picchione
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
30%
(
10 of
33)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
10 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Mirza Basic
Player
Alen Mujakic
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mirza Basic
Player
Robin Bulant
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Mirza Basic
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
80%
(
51 of
64)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Khumoun Sultanov
Player
Mirza Basic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Mirza Basic
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
13
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
94%
(
33 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lukas Klein
Player
Mirza Basic
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
11
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more