Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mischa Zverev vs Illya Marchenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zverev vs Marchenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Mischa Zverev vs Illya Marchenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zverev has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Marchenko has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zverev, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marchenko has won 46.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zverev has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marchenko has saved 64.29% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zverev has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Marchenko winning 59.32% (W/L 35/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zverev has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 152/ 105), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 126/ 172). Marchenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 231/ 136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 63/ 84).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Zverev winning 2 times. They have played 10 sets in total, with Zverev winning 5 and Marchenko winning 5. The last match between Zverev and Marchenko was at the Bratislava Challenger, 04-11-2019, Q3, I.hard with Illya Marchenko getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zverev and Marchenko have played a deciding set 2 times, with Zverev winning 1 times and Marchenko 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Zverev winning 0, and Marchenko 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zverev has played against opponents with an average rank of while Marchenko has played against players with an average rank of 310.08.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zverev has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marchenko has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zverev has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marchenko has converted 40.82% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zverev 2 - 2 Marchenko
643
Rank
25
High
36
Age
L
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
239
Rank
49
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
52% (540-506)
Career Total W/L
57% (598-443)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
31% (4-9)
$2,435,179
Career Prize Money
$1,217,273
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mischa Zverev | Illya Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 5 |
| Games Won | 50 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 14 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:22 | 1:22:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (207/322) | 58% (185/321) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (140/207) | 71% (132/185) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (61/115) | 50% (68/136) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 48% (11/23) | 26% (9/34) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (121/321) | 38% (121/322) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Illya Marchenko
Player
Mischa Zverev
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Illya Marchenko
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Mischa Zverev
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Illya Marchenko
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
43 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
38 of
100)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mischa Zverev | Illya Marchenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 35% (11/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (151/166) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 248.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 56% (606/1081) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 68% (411/606) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (234/475) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (33/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (366/1008) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 31% (4/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Mischa Zverev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Mischa Zverev
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Mayeul Darras
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Karan Singh
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Mischa Zverev
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
40%
(
6 of
15)
4
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
89%
(
8 of
9)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
12 of
15)
24
Total Points Won
6
|
6-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Adam Jurajda
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Collignon
Player
Mischa Zverev
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Mischa Zverev
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Illya Marchenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Illya Marchenko
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
48 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
111)
8
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Rio Noguchi
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Alex Bolt
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ergi Kirkin
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Yannik Steinegger
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
8
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Illya Marchenko
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve %
39%
(
24 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Illya Marchenko
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
65 of
103)
16
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
88%
(
42 of
48)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
Brandon Holt
49%
(
55 of
112)
1st Serve %
70%
(
89 of
127)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
57 of
89)
51%
(
29 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(3) 6-7(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Zverev Vs Marchenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
