Mitchell Krueger vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Hemery analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.59% of points on his second serve, while Hemery has won 50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hemery has won 46.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.78% and 27.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hemery has saved 54.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Hemery winning 62.67% (W/L 47/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 180/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 33/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Hemery winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Hemery was at the U.S. Open - New York, 24-08-2018, Q3, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Hemery have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Hemery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Hemery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 266.72 while Hemery has played against players with an average rank of 291.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hemery has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hemery has converted 35.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Hemery
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
209
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
9
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
53% (396-354)
Career Total W/L
58% (358-254)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$181,475
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Calvin Hemery |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 2:21:0 | 2:21:0 |
1st Serve % | 57% (65/114) | 61% (63/103) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (45/65) | 67% (42/63) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (22/49) | 40% (16/40) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (6/17) | 31% (4/13) |
Return Points W% | 44% (45/103) | 41% (47/114) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 7-5 6-2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Calvin Hemery
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
13
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
45%
(
22 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
41%
(
47 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Calvin Hemery |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 40% (8/12) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (38/23) | 42% (19/26) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (335/306) | 48% (211/231) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 54% (7/6) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 20% (1/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.6 |
Aces Total | 109 | 128 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 49 | 52 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:52 | 1:43:28 |
Avg Opp Rank | 327.12 | 324.8 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1313/2003) | 64% (852/1337) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (910/1313) | 72% (614/852) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (361/690) | 51% (245/485) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (79/188) | 34% (35/104) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (853/2133) | 35% (482/1377) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 25% (1/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 47% (7/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 37% (7/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (12/17) | 50% (3/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 78% (9/7) |
1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 22% (9/2) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Juan Pablo Varillas
56%
(
61 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
70 of
113)
6
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
51 of
70)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
42%
(
46 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
111
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
9
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
8
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Goffin
Player
Calvin Hemery
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Felix Gill
Player
Calvin Hemery
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Clement Tabur
Player
Calvin Hemery
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
15
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
26 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
3 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
36
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bogdan Bobrov
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
12
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more