Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Daniel Nguyen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Nguyen analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Daniel Nguyen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.93% of points on his second serve, while Nguyen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nguyen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nguyen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 56.92% of matches played (W/L 37/ 28), with Nguyen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 114/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Nguyen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 193/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.9% of matches (W/L 28/ 23), where as Nguyen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Krueger winning 4 times. They have played 15 sets in total, with Krueger winning 9 and Nguyen winning 6. The last match between Krueger and Nguyen was at the Cary Challenger, 11-09-2019, Second, Hard with Daniel Nguyen getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:58:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Nguyen have played a deciding set 3 times, with Krueger winning 2 times and Nguyen 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Nguyen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.03 while Nguyen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nguyen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nguyen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 4 - 2 Nguyen
239
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
4
Total2
2
Hard2
1
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
189
High
33
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
53% (399-355)
Career Total W/L
60% (235-159)
63% (19-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$31,840
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Daniel Nguyen |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 9 | 6 |
| Games Won | 81 | 74 |
| Aces (Total) | 24 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:58:24 | 0:58:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (140/249) | 59% (151/254) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (95/140) | 61% (92/151) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (49/109) | 56% (58/103) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (10/32) | 37% (11/30) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (104/254) | 42% (105/249) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
103)
5
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Nguyen
59%
(
49 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
91)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
8
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-3 | |||||
| 7-5 7-5 | |||||
| 4-6 7-5 7-5 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Daniel Nguyen |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (19/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (44/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (386/345) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (8/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 117 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 311.87 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1495/2276) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1040/1495) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (412/781) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (93/221) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (987/2450) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (18/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (19/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 68% (13/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Clement Tabur
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Nguyen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Daniel Nguyen
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Sumit Sarkar
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Billy Harris
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
45%
(
50 of
111)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
39%
(
7 of
18)
1st Serve %
74%
(
20 of
27)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
29
Total Points Won
16
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Arjun Kadhe
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Hiroyasu Ehara
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Krueger Vs Nguyen Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
