Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mitchell Krueger vs Nick Chappell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Chappell analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Nick Chappell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.59% of points on his second serve, while Chappell has won 49.46%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chappell has won 52.67%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.78% and 33.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chappell has saved 56.13% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Chappell winning 51.9% (W/L 41/ 38) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Krueger winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Krueger winning 4 and Chappell winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Chappell was at the Cleveland Challenger, 30-01-2023, First, I.hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:17:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Chappell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Chappell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 1, and Chappell 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 266.72 while Chappell has played against players with an average rank of 255.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chappell has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chappell has converted 42.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 2 - 0 Chappell
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
443
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
53% (396-354)
Career Total W/L
53% (300-264)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$24,525
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 32 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:17:37 | 2:17:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (97/171) | 58% (112/194) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (72/97) | 59% (66/112) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (37/74) | 50% (41/82) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (10/24) | 55% (6/11) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (87/194) | 36% (62/171) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Nick Chappell
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
18 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(6) 7-5 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Nick Chappell
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
63 of
109)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mitchell Krueger | Nick Chappell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (38/23) | 42% (21/29) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (335/306) | 48% (222/243) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 50% (8/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 109 | 40 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:52 | 1:43:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 327.12 | 291.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1313/2003) | 62% (914/1483) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (910/1313) | 65% (594/914) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (361/690) | 47% (270/569) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (79/188) | 39% (63/162) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (853/2133) | 40% (611/1543) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 25% (2/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (12/17) | 0% (0/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 8% (12/1) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Krueger Vs Chappell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
