Mitchell Krueger vs Raymond Sarmiento Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Sarmiento analysis and find out who is favored!
Mitchell Krueger vs Raymond Sarmiento Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 52.59% of points on his second serve, while Sarmiento has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sarmiento has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.78% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 59.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sarmiento has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 54.1% of matches played (W/L 33/ 28), with Sarmiento winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 86), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Sarmiento has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 48/ 23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.08% of matches (W/L 25/ 23), where as Sarmiento has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Sarmiento winning 1. The last match between Krueger and Sarmiento was at the Newport Beach Challenger, 31-01-2020, Quarterfinals, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Sarmiento have played a deciding set 1 times, with Krueger winning 1 times and Sarmiento 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Sarmiento 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 266.72 while Sarmiento has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sarmiento has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sarmiento has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Sarmiento
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
277
Rank
135
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
882
Rank
287
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
53% (396-354)
Career Total W/L
59% (169-117)
62% (16-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$697,038
Career Prize Money
$30,950
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Raymond Sarmiento |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 2:11:1 | 2:11:1 |
1st Serve % | 56% (55/98) | 71% (79/112) |
1st Serve Win% | 65% (36/55) | 59% (47/79) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (24/43) | 42% (14/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (7/18) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Points W% | 46% (51/112) | 39% (38/98) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
56%
(
55 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
79 of
112)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mitchell Krueger | Raymond Sarmiento |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (38/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (335/306) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
Aces Total | 109 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
DFs Total | 49 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:52 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 327.12 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 66% (1313/2003) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 69% (910/1313) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (361/690) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (79/188) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (853/2133) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 65% (15/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (12/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 88% (16/14) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
10 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75%
(
54 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76%
(
59 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
24 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Mitchell Krueger
56%
(
71 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
14
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
47 of
57)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
40 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
95)
110
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Mitchell Krueger
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Harold Mayot
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Raymond Sarmiento Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Mmoh
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Gabriel Diallo
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
6
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Alexander Brown
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
88)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
9
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Sebastian Gima
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Shunsuke Mitsui
70%
(
73 of
104)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raymond Sarmiento
Player
Yankel Zemel
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
25 of
30)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Connor Farren
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(0) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gonzalez
Player
Raymond Sarmiento
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 7-6(3) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-5 3-6 9-8 | H2H |
view more