search

Mitchell Krueger vs Xinquan Liao Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Krueger vs Liao analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Mitchell Krueger vs Xinquan Liao Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Krueger has won 53.02% of points on his second serve, while Liao has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Krueger, in recent form, has won 51.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Liao has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Krueger has saved 58.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Liao has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Krueger has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 35/ 28), with Liao winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Krueger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 113/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Liao has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 9% (W/L 1/ 10).
  • Player level: In the last year, Krueger has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23), where as Liao has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Krueger winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Krueger winning 2 and Liao winning 0. The last match between Krueger and Liao was at the USA F7, 11-03-2013, Q1 round, Hard with Mitchell Krueger getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Krueger and Liao have played a deciding set 0 times, with Krueger winning 0 times and Liao 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Krueger winning 0, and Liao 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Krueger has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.49 while Liao has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Krueger has won 35% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Liao has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Krueger has converted 42.56% of breakpoint opportunities, and Liao has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Krueger 1 - 0 Liao

Mitchell Krueger

8

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

4

Minor

239

Rank

135

High

30

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

High

27

Age

Plays

Xinquan Liao

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W L W W L W W W W L

Form

W L W L L L L W L L

53% (398-355)

Career Total W/L

20% (3-12)

62% (18-11)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$697,038

Career Prize Money

$0

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Krueger VS Liao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Mitchell Krueger Xinquan Liao
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 1
Aces (Total) 0 0
DFs (Total) 0 0
Avg Match Time 0:0:0 0:0:0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Points W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Krueger VS Liao H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-0 6-1

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Mitchell Krueger Xinquan Liao
YTD W/L 62% (18/11) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 62% (42/26) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 52% (374/340) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 67% (10/5) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 64% (7/4) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0.33 0
Aces Total 116 0
DFs per game 0.15 0
DFs Total 53 0
Avg Match Time 1:58:17 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 305.24 0
1st Serve % 66% (1463/2218) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 69% (1015/1463) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 53% (399/755) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 42% (89/210) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 40% (953/2381) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 33% (1/2) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 65% (17/9) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 62% (18/29) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 68% (13/19) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 40% (4/10) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 89% (18/16) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 11% (18/2) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 18% (11/2) 0% (0/0)

Mitchell Krueger Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
F
cross
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
70% ( 58 of 83)
1st Serve %
73% ( 53 of 73)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 35 of 53)
48% ( 12 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
60% ( 12 of 20)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
37% ( 31 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 26 of 73)
78
Total Points Won
78
L
6-4 7-6(9) H2H
SF
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Stefan Kozlov
69% ( 49 of 71)
1st Serve %
55% ( 41 of 74)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 26 of 41)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
35% ( 25 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 34 of 74)
80
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 3-6 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
68% ( 48 of 71)
1st Serve %
59% ( 54 of 91)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
75% ( 36 of 48)
1st Serve Won
72% ( 39 of 54)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 17 of 37)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
30% ( 21 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 35 of 91)
85
Total Points Won
77
W
7-5 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Thai Kwiatkowski
60% ( 40 of 67)
1st Serve %
55% ( 42 of 76)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
75% ( 30 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 27 of 42)
56% ( 15 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 15 of 34)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 22 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 34 of 76)
79
Total Points Won
64
W
7-6(3) 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Ethan Quinn
59% ( 40 of 68)
1st Serve %
59% ( 38 of 64)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
63% ( 25 of 40)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 9 of 26)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
40% ( 27 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 33 of 64)
74
Total Points Won
58
W
6-1 7-6(2) H2H
QF
cross
Zizou Bergs
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52% ( 40 of 77)
1st Serve %
68% ( 54 of 79)
4
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
65% ( 26 of 40)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 34 of 54)
41% ( 15 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 10 of 25)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
71% ( 5 of 7)
47% ( 36 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 35 of 79)
76
Total Points Won
80
L
6-4 1-6 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Martin Damm
64% ( 27 of 42)
1st Serve %
46% ( 31 of 68)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
7
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 22 of 31)
60% ( 9 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 10 of 37)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
26% ( 11 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 36 of 68)
67
Total Points Won
43
W
6-4 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Patrick Kypson
65% ( 59 of 91)
1st Serve %
55% ( 50 of 91)
9
Aces
12
5
Double Faults
5
68% ( 40 of 59)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 34 of 50)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 16 of 41)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
40% ( 36 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 41 of 91)
96
Total Points Won
86
W
6-2 3-6 7-6(1) H2H
QF
cross
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Mitchell Krueger
75% ( 54 of 72)
1st Serve %
71% ( 60 of 85)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
67% ( 36 of 54)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 36 of 60)
61% ( 11 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 12 of 25)
21% ( 3 of 14)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
35% ( 25 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 37 of 85)
84
Total Points Won
73
L
6-3 7-6(7) H2H
Q1
cross
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Gabriel Diallo
76% ( 59 of 78)
1st Serve %
57% ( 43 of 76)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73% ( 43 of 59)
1st Serve Won
74% ( 32 of 43)
63% ( 12 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
61% ( 20 of 33)
50% ( 1 of 2)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
29% ( 23 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
32% ( 24 of 76)
79
Total Points Won
75
W
7-6(4) 7-6(6) H2H

Xinquan Liao Recent Matches Played

Krueger Vs Liao Prediction H2H Images To Share

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mitchell Krueger

Savannah Challenger

Janvier vs Krueger H2H Pick , could play in The Semifinals

Boitan vs Krueger H2H Pick , could play in The Semifinals

Sandgren vs Krueger H2H Pick , could play in The Semifinals

Boyer vs Krueger H2H Pick , could play in The Semifinals

Krueger vs Mmoh H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Krueger vs Mayo H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Krueger vs Gomez H2H Pick , could play in The Quarterfinals

Krueger vs Andrade H2H Pick , could play in The Second round

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions