Moez Echargui vs Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Echargui vs Cardozo analysis and find out who is favored!
Moez Echargui vs Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Echargui has won 46.9% of points on his second serve, while Cardozo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Echargui, in recent form, has won 52.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cardozo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Echargui has saved 55.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cardozo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Echargui has won 50.82% of matches played (W/L 31/ 30), with Cardozo winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Echargui has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 173/ 100), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12). Cardozo has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Echargui has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 30/ 28), where as Cardozo has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Echargui has played against opponents with an average rank of 299.38 while Cardozo has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Echargui has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cardozo has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Echargui has converted 43.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cardozo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Echargui 0 - 0 Cardozo
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Moez Echargui | Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 53% (9/8) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (24/20) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 52% (235/218) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.37 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 83 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.28 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 62 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 2:19:52 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 357.18 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 55% (801/1444) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 69% (550/801) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (311/643) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (69/160) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 42% (662/1569) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 53% (9/8) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 67% (12/8) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 33% (12/4) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 1st Match |
Moez Echargui Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Moez Echargui
46%
(
59 of
129)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
114)
19
Aces
14
9
Double Faults
5
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
44%
(
31 of
70)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
51 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
120
Total Points Won
123
|
3-6 7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Moez Echargui
49%
(
54 of
110)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
59%
(
33 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
39 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moez Echargui
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
54 of
72)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Moez Echargui
Player
Hoyoung Roh
45%
(
24 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sanhui Shin
Player
Moez Echargui
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Moez Echargui
54%
(
51 of
94)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
26%
(
11 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
50 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
76)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Moez Echargui
Player
Felix Gill
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
116)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
54 of
116)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Moez Echargui
Player
Olaf Pieczkowski
51%
(
48 of
94)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexey Zakharov
Player
Moez Echargui
64%
(
72 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
115)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
115)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Moez Echargui
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
107)
3
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
17 of
47)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available