Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mohamed Safwat vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Safwat vs Dancu analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Safwat vs Vlad Andrei Dancu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Safwat has won 55.19% of points on his second serve, while Dancu has won 48.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Safwat, in recent form, has won 50.81% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dancu has won 49.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.41% and 37.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Safwat has saved 65.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dancu has saved 60.89% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Safwat has won 67.95% of matches played (W/L 53/ 25), with Dancu winning 62.34% (W/L 48/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Safwat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 282/ 155), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36). Dancu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 170/ 108), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Safwat has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Dancu has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.01% of matches (W/L 46/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Safwat winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Safwat winning 2 and Dancu winning 0. The last match between Safwat and Dancu was at the M15 Cairo, 01-09-2022, Second, Clay with Mohamed Safwat getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Safwat and Dancu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Safwat winning 0 times and Dancu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Safwat winning 1, and Dancu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Safwat has played against opponents with an average rank of 201.72 while Dancu has played against players with an average rank of 190.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Safwat has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dancu has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Safwat has converted 40.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dancu has converted 47.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Safwat 1 - 0 Dancu
357
Rank
130
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
504
Rank
504
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
59% (594-409)
Career Total W/L
59% (180-123)
67% (14-7)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$262,205
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mohamed Safwat | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:0 | 1:48:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (47/69) | 59% (39/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (34/47) | 54% (21/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (12/22) | 70% (19/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (26/66) | 33% (23/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mohamed Safwat | Vlad Andrei Dancu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (14/7) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (30/17) | 52% (26/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (251/207) | 52% (255/235) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.37 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 84 | 53 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 61 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:41 | 2:14:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.86 | 163.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (742/1297) | 56% (931/1669) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (534/742) | 66% (617/931) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (310/555) | 49% (359/738) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (62/152) | 52% (78/150) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (562/1403) | 43% (662/1554) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 77% (10/3) | 58% (11/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (14/21) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 67% (8/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 67% (9/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 33% (9/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 50% (10/5) |
Mohamed Safwat Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Robin Bertrand
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Vadym Ursu
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Matthew Hulme
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Maxim Mrva
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
41%
(
24 of
58)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Yousef Khamis
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Mohamed Safwat
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
7
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Mees Rottgering
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Mohamed Safwat
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
1-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
21 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Max Houkes
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Vlad Andrei Dancu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Bagnolini
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Francesco Cano
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
40 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
51%
(
52 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
4
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Andrea Bacaloni
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
68%
(
82 of
121)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
50 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Gianluca Cadenasso
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
94)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Lilian Marmousez
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Michael Shaw
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Safwat Vs Dancu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
