Mohamed Shabib vs Karl Enander Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Shabib vs Enander analysis and find out who is favored!
Mohamed Shabib vs Karl Enander Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shabib has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Enander has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shabib, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Enander has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Shabib has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Enander has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Shabib has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Enander winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Shabib has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 24/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Enander has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shabib winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shabib winning 2 and Enander winning 0. The last match between Shabib and Enander was at the Sweden F1, 28-04-2014, Q1 round, Clay with Mohamed Shabib getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Shabib and Enander have played a deciding set 0 times, with Shabib winning 0 times and Enander 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Shabib winning 0, and Enander 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shabib has played against opponents with an average rank of while Enander has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shabib has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Enander has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Shabib has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Enander has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Shabib 1 - 0 Enander
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (54-45)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-8)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mohamed Shabib | Karl Enander |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mohamed Shabib | Karl Enander |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mohamed Shabib Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 2-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Karl Enander Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more