Moos Sporken vs Tim Van Terheijden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sporken vs Terheijden analysis and find out who is favored!
Moos Sporken vs Tim Van Terheijden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sporken has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Terheijden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sporken, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Terheijden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sporken has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Terheijden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sporken has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Terheijden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sporken has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 57/ 48). Terheijden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 91/ 82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sporken winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sporken winning 2 and Terheijden winning 2. The last match between Sporken and Terheijden was at the Netherlands F6, 25-08-2014, First, Clay with Tim Van Terheijden getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sporken and Terheijden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sporken winning 0 times and Terheijden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sporken winning 1, and Terheijden 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sporken has played against opponents with an average rank of while Terheijden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sporken has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Terheijden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sporken has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Terheijden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sporken 1 - 1 Terheijden
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
55% (75-62)
Career Total W/L
52% (113-103)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sporken VS Terheijden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Moos Sporken | Tim Van Terheijden |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 22 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Sporken VS Terheijden H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 7-6(2) | |||||
7-6(2) 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Moos Sporken | Tim Van Terheijden |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Moos Sporken Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-1 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jan Choinski
Player
Moos Sporken
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Tim Van Terheijden Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Titouan Droguet
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Mats Hermans
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Javier Naser
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
16
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Giorgio Ricca
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more