Murphy Cassone vs Gage Brymer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Nov at 08:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cassone vs G. Brymer

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Brymer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Murphy Cassone winning 2 and Gage Brymer winning 0. The last match between Murphy Cassone and Gage Brymer was at the Knoxville Challenger, 02-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Murphy Cassone getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cassone | 1 |
| Brymer | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Knoxville Challenger(11-02-25)
M. Cassone vs G. Brymer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $74,970 | Career Prize Money | $3,190 |
| 59.09% (104-72) | Career Total W/L | 56.16% (228-178) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Cassone vs G. Brymer Match Preview:
- In the past six months, Murphy Cassone outperformed Gage Brymer on second serve points, winning 44.98% against Brymer's 42.41%. Could this slight edge indicate a potential advantage for Cassone?
- When returning opponents' second serves, Gage Brymer has a better success rate, with 47.46% compared to Cassone's 44.13%. Does this make Brymer more formidable in return games?
- Both players have similar performance in returning first serves, with Brymer slightly ahead at 24.23% compared to Cassone's 23.97%.
- Under pressure, Murphy Cassone displays more resilience by saving 57.58% of breakpoints, marginally higher than Brymer's 55.68%.
- Murphy Cassone holds a higher match win rate over the past year, securing 53.85% of his matches compared to Brymer's 37.50%. Can Cassone leverage this overall better form?
- Cassone's best performance has been on indoor hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, while Brymer excels on hard surfaces with the same win rate. Will the choice of surface impact the match outcome?
- Competing often in higher-level tournaments, Cassone faced stronger opponents, averaging a rank of 280.94, while Brymer's opponents had an average rank of 508.81.
- In matches that go to a deciding set, Brymer has a higher success rate at 67%, compared to Cassone's 46%. Could this suggest an advantage for Brymer if the match is closely contested?
- Both players' current form at the event can provide valuable insights, making it crucial to consider recent performances during the tournament.
Editorial Prediction (November 2, 2025, UTC):
Murphy Cassone's superior second serve effectiveness may give him an edge in the service games, as even slight advantages here can sway match outcomes. His ability to save breakpoints also suggests a strong mental game under pressure.
Gage Brymer excels in return games, particularly against second serves. His higher success rate in deciding sets could be pivotal if the match becomes closely contested.
Overall, Murphy Cassone's experience against stronger opponents and better performance record over the past year make him the likely favorite to win this upcoming tennis match.
Murphy Cassone vs Gage Brymer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Cassone vs G. Brymer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:58:53 | Average Match Time | 0:58:53 |
| 66% (27/41) | 1st Serve % | 74% (39/53) |
| 85% (23/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (23/39) |
| 79% (11/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (4/14) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 49% (26/53) | Return Points Win % | 17% (7/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Cassone Recent Matches Played
G. Brymer Recent Matches Played

M. Cassone vs G. Brymer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.09% (104/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.16% (228/178) |
| 57.32% (235/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.60% (493/410) |
| 52.88% (2074/1848) | Games Win/Loss | 52.10% (4371/4018) |
| 56.00% (56/44) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.54% (225/166) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.80% (40/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 25.00% (1/3) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 913 | Aces Total | 456 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 491 | Total Double Faults | 728 |
| 1:30:51 | Average Match Time | 1:27:32 |
| 352.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 461.88 |
| 64% (7135/11217) | 1st Serve % | 67% (14401/21394) |
| 71% (5100/7135) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (9221/14401) |
| 51% (2076/4081) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3647/6992) |
| 41% (428/1040) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (955/2205) |
| 39% (4333/11230) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8711/21627) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 59.05% (62/43) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (17/34) |
| 63.79% (37/21) | Futures W/L | 60.34% (210/138) |
| 59% (102/172) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (222/400) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 52% (33/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (49/91) |
| 53% (31/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (51/92) |
| 87% (104/90) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (230/202) |
| 13% (104/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (230/28) |
| 18% (72/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (175/25) |