Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Murphy Cassone vs Rodrigo Banzer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cassone vs Banzer analysis and find out who is favored!
Murphy Cassone vs Rodrigo Banzer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 47.01% of points on his second serve, while Banzer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Banzer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Banzer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Banzer winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Banzer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 16/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 50/ 29).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Banzer has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cassone winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cassone winning 2 and Banzer winning 0. The last match between Cassone and Banzer was at the M15 Cancun, 21-01-2020, Q2 round, Hard with Murphy Cassone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cassone and Banzer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Cassone winning 0 times and Banzer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cassone winning 1, and Banzer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.73 while Banzer has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Banzer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Banzer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Banzer
865
Rank
509
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
27
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
58% (38-27)
Career Total W/L
63% (66-38)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Rodrigo Banzer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Murphy Cassone | Rodrigo Banzer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (55/57) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.71 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 331.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (237/379) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (174/237) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (58/142) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 28% (11/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (141/376) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Saahith Jayaraman
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Murphy Cassone
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Murphy Cassone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Rybakov
Player
Murphy Cassone
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christian Harrison
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rodrigo Banzer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Sarkissian
Player
Rodrigo Banzer
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
103
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Banzer
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Rodrigo Banzer
Player
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rodrigo Banzer
Player
Manuel Pena Lopez
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Cassone Vs Banzer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
