Murphy Cassone vs Strong Kirchheimer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cassone vs Kirchheimer analysis and find out who is favored!
Murphy Cassone vs Strong Kirchheimer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cassone has won 47.01% of points on his second serve, while Kirchheimer has won 49.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cassone, in recent form, has won 49.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kirchheimer has won 49.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.23% and 30.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cassone has saved 54.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kirchheimer has saved 62.5% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cassone has won 46.67% of matches played (W/L 7/ 8), with Kirchheimer winning 50% (W/L 27/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cassone has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 14/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115).
- Player level: In the last year, Cassone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.34% of matches (W/L 19/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cassone winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cassone winning 2 and Kirchheimer winning 1. The last match between Cassone and Kirchheimer was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 31-10-2022, Q3, I.hard with Murphy Cassone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cassone and Kirchheimer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cassone winning 1 times and Kirchheimer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cassone winning 0, and Kirchheimer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cassone has played against opponents with an average rank of 300.73 while Kirchheimer has played against players with an average rank of 283.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cassone has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kirchheimer has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cassone has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kirchheimer has converted 41.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cassone 1 - 0 Kirchheimer
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
864
Rank
509
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
475
Rank
375
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
58% (38-27)
Career Total W/L
56% (272-210)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
42% (5-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,990
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Cassone VS Kirchheimer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Murphy Cassone | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 7 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:21 | 1:43:21 |
1st Serve % | 62% (45/73) | 56% (41/73) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (33/45) | 68% (28/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 44% (14/32) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 42% (31/73) | 33% (24/73) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cassone VS Kirchheimer H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4-6 6-3 6-1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Murphy Cassone | Strong Kirchheimer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 42% (5/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 47% (14/16) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (55/57) | 48% (134/148) |
Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (2/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.71 | 0.39 |
Aces Total | 39 | 54 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.28 |
DFs Total | 12 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:19 | 1:53:28 |
Avg Opp Rank | 331.8 | 508.67 |
1st Serve % | 63% (237/379) | 62% (567/920) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (174/237) | 70% (395/567) |
2nd Serve W% | 41% (58/142) | 50% (176/353) |
BPs Won% Total | 28% (11/39) | 38% (26/68) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (141/376) | 35% (311/878) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 33% (1/2) | 45% (5/6) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 42% (5/12) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 33% (2/6) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 50% (6/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 33% (6/2) |
Murphy Cassone Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Brandon Holt
Player
Murphy Cassone
60%
(
67 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
124)
4
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
35%
(
39 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
124)
126
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Saahith Jayaraman
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
12 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Murphy Cassone
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
11
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Murphy Cassone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Rybakov
Player
Murphy Cassone
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
43 of
60)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
15 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Christian Harrison
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Murphy Cassone
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Bogdan Bobrov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
65 of
90)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Thomas Fancutt
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
18 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adan Freire Da Silva
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
6
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
7
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Clement Chidekh
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Kenny de Schepper
59%
(
69 of
117)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
101)
12
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
52 of
69)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
37 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Henri Squire
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
9
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
55%
(
51 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
63 of
112)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
0
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Evan Zhu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more