Naman Sharma vs Paulo Knippling Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sharma vs Knippling analysis and find out who is favored!
Naman Sharma vs Paulo Knippling Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sharma has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Knippling has won 45.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sharma, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Knippling has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 37.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sharma has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Knippling has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sharma has won 11.11% of matches played (W/L 1/ 8), with Knippling winning 20% (W/L 2/ 8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sharma has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 13% (W/L 5/ 33), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 13% (W/L 5/ 33). Knippling has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 21% (W/L 3/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 20% (W/L 5/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Sharma has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 11.11% of matches (W/L 1/ 8), where as Knippling has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 2/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sharma winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Sharma winning 2 and Knippling winning 1. The last match between Sharma and Knippling was at the M25 Quinta Do Lago, 21-03-2022, Q2 round, Hard with Naman Sharma getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sharma and Knippling have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sharma winning 1 times and Knippling 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sharma winning 1, and Knippling 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sharma has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Knippling has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sharma has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Knippling has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sharma has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Knippling has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sharma 1 - 0 Knippling
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
13% (5-33)
Career Total W/L
20% (8-32)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naman Sharma | Paulo Knippling |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 13 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (43/82) | 63% (57/90) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 60% (34/57) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (15/39) | 39% (13/33) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 55% (6/11) |
Return Points W% | 48% (43/90) | 50% (41/82) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 7-6(6) 10-7 |
Naman Sharma
Player
Paulo Knippling
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
0
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
6
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
41 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naman Sharma | Paulo Knippling |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 33% (3/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) | 44% (37/47) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 0 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (51/75) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (28/51) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (11/24) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (27/63) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Naman Sharma Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Paulo Knippling Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Razvan Baiant
Player
Paulo Knippling
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 7-6(9) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Piet Steveker
Player
Paulo Knippling
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H |
view more