Nao Hibino vs Mia Pohankova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 29 Oct at 01:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hibino vs M. Pohankova

JPN
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SVK
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Hibino 0 - 1 Pohankova
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 0 and Mia Pohankova winning 2. The last match between Mia Pohankova and Nao Hibino was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 29-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Mia Pohankova getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hibino | 0 |
| Pohankova | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Chennai Open - Chennai(10-29-25)
N. Hibino vs M. Pohankova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,614,842 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 54.44% (405-339) | Career Total W/L | 74.19% (23-8) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 13 | Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 22.22% (2-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (2-1) |
N. Hibino vs M. Pohankova Match Preview:
- Nao Hibino has recently performed better on their second serve, winning 39.97% of points compared to Mia Pohankova's 36.50%.
- In return games, Mia Pohankova excels, winning 54.03% of opponents' second serve points, while Hibino wins 50.16%.
- When it comes to returning first serves, Nao Hibino outperforms with 36.82% versus Pohankova's 31.70%.
- Under pressure, Mia Pohankova shows more resilience, saving 58.49% of breakpoints, compared to Hibino's 48.84%.
- Over the past year, Pohankova has a higher win ratio of 68.75%, whereas Hibino has won 48.00% of her matches.
- Comparing surface preferences, both players have their best results on hard courts, each winning 57% of matches.
- In recent tournaments, Pohankova has a stronger win record in Challengers/ITF events, triumphing in 73.33% of matches versus Hibino's 55.00%.
- Hibino has faced tougher competition, with opponents ranked on average at 210.16 against Pohankova's 347.94.
- In deciding sets, Pohankova appears more adept, winning 67% compared to Hibino's 50% success rate.
- For dynamic predictions, check current event stats as they may reveal in-form players.
Editorial Prediction (October 29, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performances, Nao Hibino demonstrates a strong second serve game, which could be crucial if the match becomes serve-dominant. However, Mia Pohankova's exceptional return stats, especially on the second serve, suggest she is capable of breaking her opponent's rhythm.
Both players have identical proficiency on hard courts, providing no clear advantage based on surface preference. However, Pohankova's recent record and ability to save breakpoints under pressure could give her a psychological edge.
Considering the event level and quality of opponents, Hibino has faced stiffer competition, which may prepare her well for tough matches. Still, Pohankova's overall stronger recent win-loss record and skill in decisive moments point towards her as the likely victor.
Taking all factors into account, Mia Pohankova is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match due to her superior performance under pressure and recent form.
Nao Hibino vs Mia Pohankova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hibino vs M. Pohankova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:32:56 | Average Match Time | 1:32:56 |
| 69% (42/61) | 1st Serve % | 58% (40/69) |
| 50% (21/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 47% (9/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 22% (2/9) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 39% (27/69) | Return Points Win % | 51% (31/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
M. Pohankova Recent Matches Played

N. Hibino vs M. Pohankova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.44% (405/339) | YTD Win/Loss | 74.19% (23/8) |
| 52.93% (903/803) | Sets Win/Loss | 67.61% (48/23) |
| 51.50% (8023/7555) | Games Win/Loss | 55.56% (365/292) |
| 56.64% (290/222) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 45.45% (55/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 77.78% (21/6) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 1016 | Aces Total | 124 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1602 | Total Double Faults | 94 |
| 1:12:45 | Average Match Time | 1:39:10 |
| 483.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.97 |
| 65% (25642/39277) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1334/2213) |
| 61% (15531/25642) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (893/1334) |
| 46% (6318/13632) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (417/879) |
| 47% (2277/4794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (124/258) |
| 45% (17671/39513) | Return Points Win % | 45% (952/2138) |
| 47.56% (39/43) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 42.42% (28/38) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.82% (103/108) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 59.41% (202/138) | Challenger W/L | 79.17% (19/5) |
| 82.76% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 54% (398/732) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 74% (23/31) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (87/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 56% (125/222) | Deciding Set Win % | 78% (7/9) |
| 86% (382/329) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (21/20) |
| 13% (382/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (21/1) |
| 20% (362/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (10/3) |