Naoki Nakagawa vs Fons Van Sambeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakagawa vs Sambeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Nakagawa vs Fons Van Sambeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakagawa has won 50.39% of points on his second serve, while Sambeek has won 43.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakagawa, in recent form, has won 45.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sambeek has won 48.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.95% and 25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakagawa has saved 61.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sambeek has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakagawa has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 30/ 18), with Sambeek winning 51.52% (W/L 17/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Sambeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 16/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7), where as Sambeek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 16/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakagawa winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakagawa winning 2 and Sambeek winning 0. The last match between Nakagawa and Sambeek was at the M15 Monastir, 22-02-2021, Q3, Hard with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakagawa and Sambeek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakagawa winning 0 times and Sambeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakagawa winning 0, and Sambeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakagawa has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.27 while Sambeek has played against players with an average rank of 100.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakagawa has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sambeek has won 29% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakagawa has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sambeek has converted 38.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakagawa 1 - 0 Sambeek
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
424
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (295-192)
Career Total W/L
54% (35-30)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Fons Van Sambeek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Fons Van Sambeek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:49 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 112.75 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (154/295) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (108/154) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (67/141) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (11/28) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (110/294) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Fons Van Sambeek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Perry Gregg
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Nick Lagaev
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(9) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Franco Capalbo
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
7 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Justin Schlageter
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
50%
(
57 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
43 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
106)
114
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(7) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex Rybakov
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Danil Panarin
73%
(
68 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Felipe Pinzon Moreno
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Olle Wallin
Player
Fons Van Sambeek
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fons Van Sambeek
Player
Andrew Fenty
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more