Naoki Nakagawa vs Julian Cundom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakagawa vs Cundom analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Nakagawa vs Julian Cundom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakagawa has won 49.72% of points on his second serve, while Cundom has won 45.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakagawa, in recent form, has won 44.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cundom has won 44.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.31% and 27.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakagawa has saved 60.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cundom has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakagawa has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 32/ 20), with Cundom winning 42.31% (W/L 11/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Cundom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 8/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 45/ 55).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7), where as Cundom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.31% of matches (W/L 11/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakagawa winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nakagawa winning 2 and Cundom winning 0. The last match between Nakagawa and Cundom was at the Corrientes Challenger, 13-06-2022, Q3, Clay with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakagawa and Cundom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nakagawa winning 0 times and Cundom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nakagawa winning 0, and Cundom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakagawa has played against opponents with an average rank of 207.42 while Cundom has played against players with an average rank of 17.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakagawa has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cundom has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakagawa has converted 45.36% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cundom has converted 60% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakagawa 1 - 0 Cundom
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
403
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (295-192)
Career Total W/L
46% (53-61)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Julian Cundom |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:21 | 1:32:21 |
1st Serve % | 56% (33/59) | 68% (45/66) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 60% (27/45) |
2nd Serve Win% | 54% (14/26) | 24% (5/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 52% (34/66) | 34% (20/59) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Julian Cundom
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Julian Cundom |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 33% (3/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 47% (43/48) |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:49 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 112.75 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 52% (154/295) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (108/154) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (67/141) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (11/28) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (110/294) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 25% (1/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Julian Cundom Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 2-6 6-4 11-9 | H2H | |||
QF |
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Julian Cundom
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
79%
(
69 of
87)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 4-6 10-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 5-7 6-3 10-6 | H2H |
view more