Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Naoki Nakagawa vs Lilian Marmousez Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakagawa vs Marmousez analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Nakagawa vs Lilian Marmousez Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakagawa has won 50.39% of points on his second serve, while Marmousez has won 52.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakagawa, in recent form, has won 45.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Marmousez has won 51.39%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.95% and 34.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakagawa has saved 61.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marmousez has saved 52.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakagawa has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 30/ 18), with Marmousez winning 55.81% (W/L 24/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Marmousez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 39/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7), where as Marmousez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 24/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nakagawa winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nakagawa winning 2 and Marmousez winning 1. The last match between Nakagawa and Marmousez was at the M15 Monastir, 02-02-2021, First, Hard with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nakagawa and Marmousez have played a deciding set 1 times, with Nakagawa winning 1 times and Marmousez 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nakagawa winning 1, and Marmousez 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakagawa has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.27 while Marmousez has played against players with an average rank of 236.16.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakagawa has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marmousez has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakagawa has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marmousez has converted 42.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakagawa 1 - 0 Marmousez
424
Rank
334
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
820
Rank
641
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
61% (295-192)
Career Total W/L
55% (89-74)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Lilian Marmousez |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:6:0 | 3:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (75/122) | 59% (71/121) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (52/75) | 66% (47/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (26/47) | 56% (28/50) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 23% (3/13) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (46/121) | 36% (44/122) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Lilian Marmousez
61%
(
75 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Lilian Marmousez |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 63% (35/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 54% (279/234) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 63% (10/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 45 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:49 | 1:22:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 112.75 | 192.46 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (154/295) | 63% (847/1337) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (108/154) | 64% (546/847) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (67/141) | 53% (259/490) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (11/28) | 43% (65/151) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (110/294) | 41% (563/1359) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 64% (16/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 13% (8/1) |
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lilian Marmousez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Lilian Marmousez
57%
(
50 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
14
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Mischa Lanz
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Lilian Marmousez
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Dragos Nicolae Cazacu
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Pietro Marino
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vlad Andrei Dancu
Player
Lilian Marmousez
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Stylianos Christodoulou
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Giannicola Misasi
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Lilian Marmousez
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nakagawa Vs Marmousez Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
