Naoki Nakagawa vs Sami BEN Abdennibi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nakagawa vs Abdennibi analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Nakagawa vs Sami BEN Abdennibi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nakagawa has won 50.39% of points on his second serve, while Abdennibi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nakagawa, in recent form, has won 45.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Abdennibi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.95% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nakagawa has saved 61.74% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Abdennibi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nakagawa has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 30/ 18), with Abdennibi winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nakagawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 175/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 8/ 9). Abdennibi has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Nakagawa has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.13% of matches (W/L 25/ 7), where as Abdennibi has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nakagawa has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.27 while Abdennibi has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nakagawa has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Abdennibi has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nakagawa has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Abdennibi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nakagawa 0 - 0 Abdennibi
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoki Nakagawa | Sami BEN Abdennibi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (4/6) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 48% (45/48) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 18 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 10 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:49 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 112.75 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 52% (154/295) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 70% (108/154) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (67/141) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (11/28) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 37% (110/294) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 1st Match |
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
57%
(
61 of
107)
1st Serve %
52%
(
66 of
128)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
43 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
128)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
7-6(4) 5-7 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rigele Te
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
10
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
44 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
24 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andres Martin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
82
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Yusuke Takahashi
52%
(
42 of
81)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
59%
(
23 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Blake Ellis
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
50%
(
52 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
6
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 6-7(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Shintaro Mochizuki
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Sami BEN Abdennibi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Sami Ben Abdennibi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Anthony Genov
Player
Sami Ben Abdennibi
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
2 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
38
Total Points Won
17
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Sami Ben Abdennibi
Player
Dinko Dinev
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
55%
(
42 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
49 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Alp Horoz
Player
Sami Ben Abdennibi
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
52%
(
49 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Sami Ben Abdennibi
Player
Pengyu Lu
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
52%
(
35 of
67)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-6 | H2H |
view more