Naoki Tajima vs Jake Hersey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tajima vs Hersey analysis and find out who is favored!
Naoki Tajima vs Jake Hersey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tajima has won 48.71% of points on his second serve, while Hersey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tajima, in recent form, has won 47.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hersey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tajima has saved 58.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hersey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tajima has won 53.7% of matches played (W/L 29/ 25), with Hersey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tajima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Hersey has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 34/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Tajima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56% of matches (W/L 28/ 22), where as Hersey has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tajima winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tajima winning 2 and Hersey winning 0. The last match between Tajima and Hersey was at the M15 Monastir, 14-11-2019, Second, Hard with Naoki Tajima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tajima and Hersey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tajima winning 0 times and Hersey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tajima winning 0, and Hersey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tajima has played against opponents with an average rank of 100.17 while Hersey has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tajima has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hersey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tajima has converted 49.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hersey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tajima 1 - 0 Hersey
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
881
Rank
604
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
48% (115-125)
Career Total W/L
50% (51-50)
52% (11-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Naoki Tajima | Jake Hersey |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (25/50) | 53% (28/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (19/25) | 61% (17/28) |
2nd Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 44% (11/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 47% (25/53) | 30% (15/50) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Jake Hersey
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Naoki Tajima | Jake Hersey |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (11/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (256/216) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:20:56 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 97.38 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (600/1041) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (427/600) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (209/441) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (56/115) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (469/1084) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (10/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Naoki Tajima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Daisuke Sumizawa
Player
Naoki Tajima
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-1 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jesse Delaney
Player
Naoki Tajima
72%
(
68 of
94)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
44 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sam Oster
Player
Naoki Tajima
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
46%
(
33 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Makoto Ochi
Player
Naoki Tajima
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
11
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
55 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Naoki Tajima
Player
Luke Sorensen
55%
(
42 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 5-7 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jake Hersey Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-7(7) 0-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 4-6 14-12 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Christian Samuelsson
Player
Jake Hersey
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
10
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-3 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jake Hersey
Player
Johannus Monday
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 2-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henry Patten
Player
Jake Hersey
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jake Hersey
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tom Hands
Player
Jake Hersey
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
15 of
21)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H |
view more