Nathan De Veer vs Cheraag Bajwa Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Veer vs Bajwa analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan De Veer vs Cheraag Bajwa Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Veer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bajwa has won 48.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Veer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bajwa has won 44.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Veer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bajwa has saved 45.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Veer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bajwa winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Veer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 8/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 8/ 15). Bajwa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 13/ 35), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Veer winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Veer winning 2 and Bajwa winning 0. The last match between Veer and Bajwa was at the Netherlands F6, 22-08-2016, Q1 round, Clay with Nathan De Veer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Veer and Bajwa have played a deciding set 0 times, with Veer winning 0 times and Bajwa 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Veer winning 0, and Bajwa 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Veer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bajwa has played against players with an average rank of 89.63.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Veer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bajwa has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Veer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bajwa has converted 30% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Veer 1 - 0 Bajwa
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
36% (9-16)
Career Total W/L
21% (16-59)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathan De Veer | Cheraag Bajwa |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathan De Veer | Cheraag Bajwa |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 23% (7/24) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.07 |
Aces Total | 0 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.07 |
DFs Total | 0 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (66/100) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (32/66) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (17/34) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 30% (31/104) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Nathan De Veer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 4-6 7-5 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H |
view more
Cheraag Bajwa Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Shaw
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Louis Larue
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivan Kremenchutskyi
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
57
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Zach Stephens
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
4-6 6-0 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lorenzo Vatteroni
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Peter Bertran
Player
Cheraag Bajwa
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cheraag Bajwa
Player
Victor Kuznetsov
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
48%
(
16 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
55%
(
28 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 0-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more