Nathan Ponwith vs Andres Alvarez Cerdan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Cerdan analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Andres Alvarez Cerdan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 53.6% of points on his second serve, while Cerdan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 46.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Cerdan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 56.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cerdan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 30.61% of matches played (W/L 15/ 34), with Cerdan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Cerdan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 15/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25), where as Cerdan has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ponwith winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 2 and Cerdan winning 0. The last match between Ponwith and Cerdan was at the USA F7, 24-02-2014, Q1 round, Clay with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Cerdan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ponwith winning 0 times and Cerdan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Cerdan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 199.04 while Cerdan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cerdan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 36.8% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cerdan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ponwith 1 - 0 Cerdan
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
744
Rank
367
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (166-132)
Career Total W/L
49% (51-54)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathan Ponwith | Andres Alvarez Cerdan |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathan Ponwith | Andres Alvarez Cerdan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 41% (16/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (175/197) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
Aces Total | 39 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
DFs Total | 60 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:25 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 269.71 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (710/1219) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (454/710) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (273/509) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (39/95) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (445/1174) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Nathan Ponwith
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jaime Faria
Player
Nathan Ponwith
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
John Echeverria
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Andres Alvarez Cerdan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
43%
(
30 of
70)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Patrick Daciek
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
41%
(
23 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Federico Zeballos
Player
Andres Alvarez Cerdan
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more