Nathan Ponwith vs Jack Anthrop Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ponwith vs Anthrop analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathan Ponwith vs Jack Anthrop Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ponwith has won 52.14% of points on his second serve, while Anthrop has won 38.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ponwith, in recent form, has won 45.26% of his opponent's second serve points, while Anthrop has won 61.76%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.68% and 45.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ponwith has saved 55.41% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Anthrop has saved 38.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ponwith has won 28.57% of matches played (W/L 14/ 35), with Anthrop winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14). Anthrop has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 14/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 18.75% of matches (W/L 6/ 26), where as Anthrop has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 6/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Ponwith winning 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Ponwith winning 6 and Anthrop winning 2. The last match between Ponwith and Anthrop was at the Columbus 2 Challenger, 19-09-2022, Q3, I.hard with Nathan Ponwith getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ponwith and Anthrop have played a deciding set 2 times, with Ponwith winning 2 times and Anthrop 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ponwith winning 0, and Anthrop 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ponwith has played against opponents with an average rank of 173.57 while Anthrop has played against players with an average rank of 214.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ponwith has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Anthrop has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ponwith has converted 36.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Anthrop has converted 58.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ponwith 3 - 0 Anthrop
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
613
Rank
367
High
25
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
887
Rank
839
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (164-130)
Career Total W/L
45% (20-24)
38% (5-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathan Ponwith | Jack Anthrop |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
Sets Won | 6 | 2 |
Games Won | 40 | 29 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 9 |
DFs (Total) | 10 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:57:45 | 1:57:45 |
1st Serve % | 60% (133/220) | 67% (145/215) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (92/133) | 66% (95/145) |
2nd Serve Win% | 52% (45/87) | 44% (31/70) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (12/22) | 38% (6/16) |
Return Points W% | 41% (89/215) | 38% (83/220) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set L, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3-6 6-4 6-4 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jack Anthrop
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
1-6 6-3 6-4 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jack Anthrop
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
6-1 6-1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Jack Anthrop
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathan Ponwith | Jack Anthrop |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 38% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (134/149) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.24 | 0 |
Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:51 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 218.46 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 59% (558/944) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (348/558) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (207/386) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (31/75) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 38% (338/886) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (5/13) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jaime Faria
Player
Nathan Ponwith
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
John Echeverria
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Duarte Vale
64%
(
91 of
142)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
65 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
124
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Henrik Wiersholm
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alex Knaff
Player
Nathan Ponwith
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Kypson
Player
Nathan Ponwith
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jack Anthrop Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Shunsuke Mitsui
Player
Jack Anthrop
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
111)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
1
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
50%
(
55 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
58 of
111)
112
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Laurent Lokoli
Player
Jack Anthrop
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jack Anthrop
Player
Radu Mihai Papoe
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jack Anthrop
Player
Stefan Kozlov
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Jack Anthrop
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Jack Anthrop
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jelani Sarr
Player
Jack Anthrop
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
52 of
97)
9
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
Jacob Brumm
Player
Jack Anthrop
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
82%
(
50 of
61)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Jack Anthrop
Player
Keegan Smith
78%
(
72 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
59 of
78)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
27 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
24 of
78)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jack Anthrop
Player
Jaimee Floyd Angele
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H |
view more