Nathaniel Lammons vs Daniel Nguyen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammons vs Nguyen analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathaniel Lammons vs Daniel Nguyen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammons has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nguyen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammons, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nguyen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nguyen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammons has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nguyen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nguyen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 193/ 116), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lammons winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lammons winning 2 and Nguyen winning 1. The last match between Lammons and Nguyen was at the Knoxville Challenger, 04-11-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Nathaniel Lammons getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lammons and Nguyen have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lammons winning 1 times and Nguyen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lammons winning 0, and Nguyen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammons has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nguyen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammons has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nguyen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammons has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nguyen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lammons 1 - 0 Nguyen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
189
High
33
Age
R
Plays
15
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
15
Minor
Form
54% (78-67)
Career Total W/L
60% (235-159)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$31,840
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Daniel Nguyen |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 15 | 14 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:37 | 1:43:37 |
1st Serve % | 68% (71/104) | 68% (53/78) |
1st Serve Win% | 75% (53/71) | 72% (38/53) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (16/33) | 68% (17/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 9% (1/11) |
Return Points W% | 29% (23/78) | 34% (35/104) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Daniel Nguyen
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
14
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
35 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
23 of
78)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Daniel Nguyen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Nguyen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Jason Jung
Player
Daniel Nguyen
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Sumit Sarkar
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
F |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Billy Harris
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
45%
(
50 of
111)
9
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
111)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Shuichi Sekiguchi
39%
(
7 of
18)
1st Serve %
74%
(
20 of
27)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
29
Total Points Won
16
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Arjun Kadhe
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
8
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Hiroyasu Ehara
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
F | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
SF |
Daniel Nguyen
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
42%
(
24 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H |
view more