Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nathaniel Lammons vs Franco Agamenone Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lammons vs Agamenone analysis and find out who is favored!
Nathaniel Lammons vs Franco Agamenone Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lammons has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Agamenone has won 46.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lammons, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Agamenone has won 47.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lammons has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Agamenone has saved 56.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lammons has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Agamenone winning 45.61% (W/L 26/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Agamenone has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 333/ 235), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lammons winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lammons winning 0 and Agamenone winning 2. The last match between Lammons and Agamenone was at the Panama City Challenger, 31-03-2018, Q2 round, Clay with Franco Agamenone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lammons and Agamenone have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lammons winning 0 times and Agamenone 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lammons winning 0, and Agamenone 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lammons has played against opponents with an average rank of while Agamenone has played against players with an average rank of 254.49.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lammons has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Agamenone has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lammons has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Agamenone has converted 50.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lammons 0 - 1 Agamenone
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
214
Rank
108
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
54% (78-67)
Career Total W/L
58% (372-270)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
39% (7-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,150
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Franco Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:26 | 1:12:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) | 71% (44/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 50% (20/40) | 70% (31/44) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (25/62) | 50% (30/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nathaniel Lammons | Franco Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (15/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (179/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:42:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 176.72 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (866/1298) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (536/866) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (199/432) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (52/102) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (464/1195) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 41% (7/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Franco Agamenone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
74%
(
73 of
99)
1st Serve %
80%
(
74 of
93)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
43%
(
43 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Franco Agamenone
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Marcello Serafini
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Franco Agamenone
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Zdenek Kolar
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
91)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Franco Agamenone
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lammons Vs Agamenone Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
