Nerman Fatic vs Carlo Alberto Caniato Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 12:18 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs C. Alberto Caniato

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Caniato
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Carlo Alberto Caniato winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Carlo Alberto Caniato was at the Olbia Challenger, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Fatic | 1 |
Caniato | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Olbia Challenger(10-16-25)
N. Fatic vs C. A. Caniato H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$73,995 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
58.60% (402-284) | Career Total W/L | 54.84% (68-56) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
12 | Titles | 1 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Fatic vs C. A. Caniato Match Preview:
- Nerman Fatic's recent second serve performance shows a 44.11% point win rate compared to Carlo Alberto Caniato's 46.15%. How significant is this? The correlation with match predictions is high.
- In recent form, Fatic excels in return games, winning 44.43% of opponent's second serves versus Caniato's 41.42%. This is key to favoring him in match predictions.
- First serve return comparisons show Fatic winning 28.50% against Caniato's 22.99%, highlighting his edge in returning serves.
- How do they perform under pressure? Fatic has a slight advantage in saving breakpoints, at 53.94% to Caniato's 53.58%.
- Looking at match records over the past year, Fatic's win rate is 77.78% while Caniato achieves 62.30%. Who has the stronger overall form? Fatic clearly does.
- Both players excel on Clay, each with a 61% win ratio, but neither has impressive stats on other surfaces.
- Fatic has faced higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 345.51 compared to Caniato's 423.25, suggesting tougher competition experience.
- In deciding sets over the last 12 months, Fatic holds an 88% win rate, while Caniato wins 33%, indicating Fatic's stronger endurance in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Nerman Fatic's recent prowess in return games and his superior performance in deciding sets signal a strong advantage over Carlo Alberto Caniato. Additionally, his experience against higher-ranked opponents and higher overall match win rate over the past year further fortify his position as the likely favorite.
While Caniato shows slightly better second serve performance in recent months, Fatic compensates with his return ability and pressure resilience. Given these factors, Fatic's profile presents a more comprehensive preparedness for this matchup.
Based on these analyses, Nerman Fatic is predicted to be the most probable winner of this upcoming tennis match.
Nerman Fatic vs Carlo Alberto Caniato Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs C. A. Caniato H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
15 | Games Won | 12 |
4 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:41:46 | Average Match Time | 1:41:46 |
61% (51/83) | 1st Serve % | 64% (46/72) |
65% (33/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (32/46) |
59% (19/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (12/26) |
63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) |
39% (28/72) | Return Points Win % | 37% (31/83) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
C. A. Caniato Recent Matches Played

N. Fatic vs C. A. Caniato Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
58.60% (402/284) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.84% (68/56) |
57.57% (886/653) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.87% (152/125) |
53.04% (7547/6681) | Games Win/Loss | 52.49% (1393/1261) |
51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.83% (11/13) |
61.04% (340/217) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.38% (57/39) |
44.19% (19/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
1560 | Aces Total | 352 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
1501 | Total Double Faults | 276 |
1:19:51 | Average Match Time | 1:32:51 |
509.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 458.44 |
66% (23571/35458) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4635/7572) |
65% (15427/23571) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (3186/4635) |
48% (5709/11887) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1545/2937) |
47% (1953/4180) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (307/688) |
43% (15481/35816) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2923/7477) |
20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
53.15% (118/104) | Challenger W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
63.30% (276/160) | Futures W/L | 59.80% (61/41) |
60% (393/659) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (65/120) |
0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
51% (79/154) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (17/37) |
54% (102/188) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (13/32) |
88% (392/346) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (71/59) |
11% (392/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (71/12) |
19% (294/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (52/8) |