Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Carlos GIMENO Valero Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Valero analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Carlos GIMENO Valero Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.09% of points on his second serve, while Valero has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Valero has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.71% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Valero has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Valero winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Valero has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Valero has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Valero has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Valero has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Valero has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 0 Valero
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Carlos GIMENO Valero |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 70 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 33 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 1st Match |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Carlos GIMENO Valero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zdenek Kolar
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Lorenzo Rottoli
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
93)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Mark Whitehouse
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
89%
(
76 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Player
Carlos Gimeno Valero
87%
(
98 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
8
51%
(
50 of
98)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
31%
(
8 of
26)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
50%
(
57 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
105)
111
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Fabio De Michele
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
1
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
35 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Vilius Gaubas
61%
(
67 of
110)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
2
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
107
|
1-6 7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Cezar Cretu
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
66%
(
19 of
29)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Valero Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
