Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Lucas Miedler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Miedler analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Lucas Miedler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 48.09% of points on his second serve, while Miedler has won 44.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Miedler has won 51.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.71% and 27.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miedler has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Miedler winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Miedler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 181/ 76), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Miedler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Fatic winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Fatic winning 4 and Miedler winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Miedler was at the Como Challenger, 31-08-2022, Second, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Miedler have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Miedler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Miedler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Miedler has played against players with an average rank of 291.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miedler has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miedler has converted 38.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Miedler
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
201
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
60% (338-226)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
67% (2-1)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$43,270
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Lucas Miedler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:26:37 | 1:26:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (82/117) | 58% (59/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (58/82) | 63% (37/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (20/35) | 50% (21/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 58% (7/12) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (43/101) | 33% (39/117) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Nerman Fatic
Player
Lucas Miedler
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
43%
(
22 of
51)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Lucas Miedler
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Lucas Miedler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 67% (2/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 56% (5/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 49% (46/48) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1:29:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 123.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 65% (122/189) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 70% (85/122) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 45% (30/67) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 38% (5/13) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 35% (63/178) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Lucas Miedler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Lucas Miedler
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
0
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Neil Oberleitner
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
19
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Barrientos
Player
Lucas Miedler
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Lucas Miedler
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Lucas Miedler
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Lucas Miedler
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
14
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Miedler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
