Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nerman Fatic vs Salvatore Caruso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Caruso analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Salvatore Caruso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.71% of points on his second serve, while Caruso has won 48.91%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 47.19% of his opponent's second serve points, while Caruso has won 56.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.27% and 34.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 57.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Caruso has saved 52.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Caruso winning 50% (W/L 35/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Caruso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 253/ 197), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 41/ 54).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Caruso has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Fatic winning 1 and Caruso winning 2. The last match between Fatic and Caruso was at the Trieste Challenger, 21-07-2022, Second, Clay with Salvatore Caruso getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Caruso have played a deciding set 1 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Caruso 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Caruso 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.91 while Caruso has played against players with an average rank of 272.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Caruso has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Caruso has converted 48.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Caruso
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
361
Rank
76
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
54% (417-355)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
47% (9-10)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$927,160
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Salvatore Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:31:42 | 2:31:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (54/95) | 58% (43/74) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (34/54) | 67% (29/43) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (19/41) | 48% (15/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 28% (5/18) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (30/74) | 44% (42/95) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Nerman Fatic
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nerman Fatic | Salvatore Caruso |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 47% (9/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 47% (23/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 49% (215/220) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 47% (8/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.2 |
| Aces Total | 70 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1:52:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 347.27 | 247.21 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 56% (734/1315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 66% (482/734) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 49% (285/581) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 49% (68/140) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 41% (558/1351) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 50% (7/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 10% (10/1) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Salvatore Caruso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Piraino
Player
Salvatore Caruso
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve %
71%
(
24 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
15 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
39
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Pietro Marino
58%
(
44 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alec Beckley
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
61 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Diogo Marques
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
39 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hynek Barton
Player
Salvatore Caruso
53%
(
43 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
17
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Salvatore Caruso
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Timofey Skatov
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Salvatore Caruso
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Jesper De Jong
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Salvatore Caruso
Player
Mitchell Krueger
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
75 of
116)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
48 of
75)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Fatic Vs Caruso Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
