Nerman Fatic vs Vit Kopriva Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Kopriva analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Vit Kopriva Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.72% of points on his second serve, while Kopriva has won 43.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 47.23% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kopriva has won 52.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.11% and 34.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 60.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kopriva has saved 61.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 54.93% of matches played (W/L 39/ 32), with Kopriva winning 57.97% (W/L 40/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 278/ 186), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Kopriva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 242/ 156), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54% of matches (W/L 27/ 23), where as Kopriva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fatic winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fatic winning 0 and Kopriva winning 2. The last match between Fatic and Kopriva was at the Meerbusch Challenger, 10-08-2021, First, Clay with Vit Kopriva getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Kopriva have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Kopriva 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 0, and Kopriva 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 262.93 while Kopriva has played against players with an average rank of 276.14.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kopriva has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 41.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kopriva has converted 47.16% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Kopriva
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
200
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
116
Rank
111
High
26
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
58% (338-249)
Career Total W/L
59% (339-234)
45% (5-6)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$70,890
Career Prize Money
$319,625
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Vit Kopriva |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 13 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:38:2 | 1:38:2 |
1st Serve % | 60% (42/70) | 66% (40/61) |
1st Serve Win% | 62% (26/42) | 65% (26/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 29% (8/28) | 57% (12/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 36% (5/14) |
Return Points W% | 38% (23/61) | 51% (36/70) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-2 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Vit Kopriva |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 45% (5/6) | 58% (11/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 46% (12/14) | 55% (24/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (117/133) | 51% (211/205) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 56% (9/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.5 | 0.37 |
Aces Total | 61 | 75 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.44 |
DFs Total | 25 | 91 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:35 | 1:37:10 |
Avg Opp Rank | 310.73 | 237.95 |
1st Serve % | 62% (425/683) | 62% (788/1273) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (304/425) | 70% (552/788) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (125/258) | 44% (213/485) |
BPs Won% Total | 31% (17/54) | 46% (56/123) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (260/730) | 39% (494/1255) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 75% (3/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 100% (1/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 38% (3/5) | 33% (2/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (5/11) | 59% (10/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (2/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (9/9) |
1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (9/0) |
1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 20% (10/2) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Terence Atmane
Player
Nerman Fatic
68%
(
76 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
33%
(
37 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
21 of
78)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Illya Marchenko
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
QF |
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Nerman Fatic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Vit Kopriva Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Vit Kopriva
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Jeff Wolf
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Rei Sakamoto
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
3
Aces
12
8
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aleksandar Vukic
Player
Vit Kopriva
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
53
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(4) 6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Constant Lestienne
Player
Vit Kopriva
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
19 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Cooper Woestendick
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
74)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Vit Kopriva
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Vit Kopriva
Player
Maximilian Marterer
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more