Nick Chappell vs Gustavo Loza Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Loza analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Gustavo Loza Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 48.54% of points on his second serve, while Loza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 53.83% of his opponent's second serve points, while Loza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 54.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Loza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 53.09% of matches played (W/L 43/ 38), with Loza winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 215/ 145), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Loza has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 23% (W/L 5/ 17), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Loza has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 265.95 while Loza has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 39% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Loza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 45.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Loza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 0 - 0 Loza
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
428
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
36
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
53% (298-261)
Career Total W/L
19% (5-22)
41% (7-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nick Chappell | Gustavo Loza |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 41% (7/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 41% (15/22) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (158/180) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.11 | 0 |
Aces Total | 18 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0 |
DFs Total | 36 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:37:49 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 305.24 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (669/1089) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (418/669) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (189/420) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (52/119) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 41% (452/1095) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (7/17) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Elliot Benchetrit
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Hynek Barton
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nick Chappell
Player
Lars Wagenaar
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Gustavo Loza Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 5-7 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more