Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Zane Khan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Khan analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Zane Khan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 49.46% of points on his second serve, while Khan has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 52.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khan has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.5% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 56.13% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khan has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 51.9% of matches played (W/L 41/ 38), with Khan winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Khan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 57/ 28), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Khan has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Chappell winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Chappell winning 4 and Khan winning 2. The last match between Chappell and Khan was at the M15 Cancun, 08-11-2019, Quarterfinals, Hard with Nick Chappell getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:21:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Khan have played a deciding set 2 times, with Chappell winning 2 times and Khan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 1, and Khan 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.27 while Khan has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khan has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 42.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khan has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 2 - 0 Khan
443
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
404
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
53% (300-264)
Career Total W/L
65% (62-34)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$2,555
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Chappell | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 36 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 3:21:30 | 3:21:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (129/209) | 50% (110/220) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (85/129) | 66% (73/110) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (52/80) | 55% (60/110) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (9/25) | 32% (6/19) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (87/220) | 34% (72/209) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Zane Khan
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
64%
(
28 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Zane Khan
67%
(
74 of
110)
1st Serve %
47%
(
59 of
125)
6
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
10
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
67%
(
24 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
50 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Zane Khan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (21/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (222/243) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.23 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (914/1483) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (594/914) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (270/569) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (63/162) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (611/1543) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Zane Khan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Zane Khan
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgeny Donskoy
Player
Zane Khan
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Damir Dzumhur
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Sergiy Stakhovsky
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
12
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
24 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Zane Khan
75%
(
3 of
4)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
2)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
6
Total Points Won
0
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
77)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Takuto Niki
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
81%
(
17 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zane Khan
Player
Pedro Araujo
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Zane Khan
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
8
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chappell Vs Khan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
