Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Cmager vs Cade Birrell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Cmager vs Birrell analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Cmager vs Cade Birrell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cmager has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Birrell has won 45.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cmager, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Birrell has won 48.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cmager has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Birrell has saved 49.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cmager has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Birrell winning 45.65% (W/L 21/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cmager has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 13/ 7), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Birrell has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 8/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 27% (W/L 6/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cmager winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cmager winning 2 and Birrell winning 1. The last match between Cmager and Birrell was at the Turkey F18 (Antalya), 06-05-2018, Q2 round, Clay with Nick Cmager getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cmager and Birrell have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cmager winning 1 times and Birrell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Cmager winning 0, and Birrell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cmager has played against opponents with an average rank of while Birrell has played against players with an average rank of 14.02.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cmager has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Birrell has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cmager has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Birrell has converted 40.45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Cmager 1 - 0 Birrell
Ret.
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
62% (13-8)
Career Total W/L
37% (39-66)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Cmager | Cade Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Cmager | Cade Birrell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 36% (5/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (67/83) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 14 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 107.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (98/164) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (69/98) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (33/66) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 32% (44/138) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Nick Cmager Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Albano Olivetti
Player
Nick Cmager
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
11
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vital Flurin Leuch
Player
Nick Cmager
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Cmager
Player
Marco Corino
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Artur Shakhnubaryan
Player
Nick Cmager
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
123)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
123)
126
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(3) 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Cmager
Player
Tim Van Der Horst
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
8
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Cade Birrell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Cade Birrell
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cade Birrell
Player
Luke Sorensen
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
19 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
26 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Andre Szilvassy
Player
Cade Birrell
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-0 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Cade Birrell
Player
James Sim
50%
(
41 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mason Naumovski
Player
Cade Birrell
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cade Birrell
Player
Winter Meagher
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 6-7(4) 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Cmager Vs Birrell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
