Nico Matic vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matic vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!
Nico Matic vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 102/ 65), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 25/ 20). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Matic winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Matic winning 5 and Beem winning 2. The last match between Matic and Beem was at the Belgium F3, 30-06-2016, Second, Clay with Colin Van Beem getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matic and Beem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Matic winning 0 times and Beem 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Matic winning 2, and Beem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Matic 2 - 1 Beem
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Ret.
Rank
465
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard0
2
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
537
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (130-90)
Career Total W/L
56% (191-153)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nico Matic | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
Games Won | 34 | 32 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 9 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:38:20 | 0:38:20 |
1st Serve % | 47% (43/92) | 61% (54/88) |
1st Serve Win% | 60% (26/43) | 80% (43/54) |
2nd Serve Win% | 41% (20/49) | 44% (15/34) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 78% (7/9) |
Return Points W% | 34% (30/88) | 50% (46/92) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-0 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Nico Matic
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
43 of
92)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
6-2 7-6(3) | |||||
6-4 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nico Matic | Colin Van Beem |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nico Matic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Baptiste Crepatte
Player
Nico Matic
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Dominik Boehler
Player
Nico Matic
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
102)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
45 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-6(4) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nico Matic
Player
Filip Bergevi
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nico Matic
Player
Kai Wehnelt
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more