Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nicolae Frunza vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frunza vs Gramaticopolo analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolae Frunza vs Biagio Gramaticopolo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frunza has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gramaticopolo has won 43.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frunza, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gramaticopolo has won 44.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.93% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frunza has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gramaticopolo has saved 47.22% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frunza has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gramaticopolo winning 47.37% (W/L 18/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frunza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 192/ 109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Gramaticopolo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Frunza winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Frunza winning 2 and Gramaticopolo winning 0. The last match between Frunza and Gramaticopolo was at the M15 Antalya, 25-04-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Nicolae Frunza getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Frunza and Gramaticopolo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Frunza winning 0 times and Gramaticopolo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Frunza winning 0, and Gramaticopolo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frunza has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gramaticopolo has played against players with an average rank of 75.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frunza has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gramaticopolo has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frunza has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gramaticopolo has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Frunza 1 - 0 Gramaticopolo
883
Rank
442
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
63% (217-129)
Career Total W/L
47% (45-51)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Frunza VS Gramaticopolo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Nicolae Frunza | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Frunza VS Gramaticopolo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nicolae Frunza | Biagio Gramaticopolo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 29% (4/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (61/85) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 74.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 55% (108/198) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (62/108) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (42/90) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (65/186) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 17% (1/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Nicolae Frunza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Yassine Dlimi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maks Kasnikowski
Player
Nicolae Frunza
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Yanaki Milev
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
24 of
30)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
103)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
15
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Nicolae Frunza
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
46 of
97)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
David Jorda Sanchis
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
41 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolae Frunza
Player
Nikola Kolyachev
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleksandr Bielinskyi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Nicolae Frunza
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Biagio Gramaticopolo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthias Ujvary
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanis Ghazouani Durand
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
45%
(
18 of
40)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicola Rispoli
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Frunza Vs Gramaticopolo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
