Nicolas Meister vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Meister vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Nicolas Meister vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Meister has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Meister, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Meister has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Meister has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Meister has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 188/ 118), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 17% (W/L 2/ 10). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Meister winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Meister winning 2 and Spec winning 1. The last match between Meister and Spec was at the USA F23, 29-06-2016, First, Hard with Nicolas Meister getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:5:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Meister and Spec have played a deciding set 1 times, with Meister winning 1 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Meister winning 0, and Spec 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Meister has played against opponents with an average rank of while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Meister has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Meister has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Meister 1 - 0 Spec
4
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
545
Rank
263
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (204-141)
Career Total W/L
64% (167-95)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$14,245
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nicolas Meister | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 18 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 8 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 3:5:0 | 3:5:0 |
1st Serve % | 53% (46/86) | 53% (57/108) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (36/46) | 72% (41/57) |
2nd Serve Win% | 63% (25/40) | 43% (22/51) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 33% (1/3) |
Return Points W% | 42% (45/108) | 29% (25/86) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-1 |
Nicolas Meister
Player
Matic Spec
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
25 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nicolas Meister | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nicolas Meister Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nicolas Meister
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Nicolas Meister
56%
(
52 of
93)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolas Meister
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
78 of
100)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
106)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
8
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(5) 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Nicolas Meister
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henry Craig
Player
Nicolas Meister
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Denis Kudla
Player
Nicolas Meister
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
14
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Nicolas Meister
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
50 of
69)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Bester
Player
Nicolas Meister
42%
(
28 of
66)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James Mcgee
Player
Nicolas Meister
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
72 of
107)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
44 of
72)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
45 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
107)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more