Niels Visker vs Deney Wassermann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Visker vs Wassermann analysis and find out who is favored!
Upcoming Match
Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Niels Visker takes on Deney Wassermann in the ATP M15 Antalya Men's Singles 2024 on . Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page.
Niels Visker vs Deney Wassermann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Visker has won 53.33% of points on his second serve, while Wassermann has won 50.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Visker, in recent form, has won 46.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wassermann has won 51.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.25% and 34.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Visker has saved 71.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wassermann has saved 62.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Visker has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Wassermann winning 59.18% (W/L 29/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 60/ 38). Wassermann has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 68/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.38% of matches (W/L 47/ 26), where as Wassermann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.42% of matches (W/L 29/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Visker winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Visker winning 1 and Wassermann winning 2. The last match between Visker and Wassermann was at the M25 Alkmaar, 21-06-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Deney Wassermann getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Visker and Wassermann have played a deciding set 1 times, with Visker winning 0 times and Wassermann 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Visker winning 1, and Wassermann 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Visker has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.89 while Wassermann has played against players with an average rank of 176.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Visker has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wassermann has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Visker has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wassermann has converted 37.14% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Visker 0 - 1 Wassermann
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
650
Rank
650
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
704
Rank
702
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
64% (110-62)
Career Total W/L
59% (99-68)
73% (16-6)
YTD W/L
60% (6-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Visker VS Wassermann H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Niels Visker | Deney Wassermann |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
Games Won | 19 | 23 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Visker VS Wassermann H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(4) 6-7(2) 10-6 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Niels Visker | Deney Wassermann |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 100% (2/0) | 100% (2/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 100% (4/0) | 80% (4/1) |
Games Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 57% (28/21) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.25 |
Aces Total | 8 | 6 |
DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.29 |
DFs Total | 9 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:30:30 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 322 |
1st Serve % | 59% (79/133) | 53% (94/178) |
1st Serve W% | 77% (61/79) | 70% (66/94) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (28/54) | 58% (49/84) |
BPs Won% Total | 64% (7/11) | 22% (5/23) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (52/118) | 39% (68/175) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
SF |
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Niels Visker
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Niels Visker
Player
Erik Arutiunian
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Sergey Fomin
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Max Batyutenko
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
12%
(
5 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Marek Gengel
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Niels Visker
Player
Emile Hudd
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
14
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
53 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Deney Wassermann Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Henry Searle
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
75 of
112)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
51 of
75)
63%
(
30 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
8%
(
1 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(8) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Deney Wassermann
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
12 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ignacio Buse
Player
Deney Wassermann
38%
(
3 of
8)
1st Serve %
58%
(
7 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
100%
(
3 of
3)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
11
Total Points Won
9
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Nikolay Nedelchev
Player
Deney Wassermann
78%
(
77 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
34 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
64)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Imanol Lopez Morillo
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
76%
(
26 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
15 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jerome Kym
Player
Deney Wassermann
52%
(
49 of
94)
1st Serve %
49%
(
47 of
95)
6
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
84%
(
41 of
49)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
33%
(
31 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Deney Wassermann
Player
Raphael Calzi
51%
(
44 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more