Niels Visker vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Visker vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Niels Visker vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Visker has won 53.33% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Visker, in recent form, has won 46.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.25% and 35.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Visker has saved 71.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 53.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Visker has won 64.47% of matches played (W/L 49/ 27), with Nijboer winning 62.22% (W/L 56/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 60/ 38). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.38% of matches (W/L 47/ 26), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.11% of matches (W/L 51/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Visker winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Visker winning 3 and Nijboer winning 3. The last match between Visker and Nijboer was at the Amersfoort Challenger, 17-07-2023, Q3, Clay with Niels Visker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:56:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Visker and Nijboer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Visker winning 1 times and Nijboer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Visker winning 1, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Visker has played against opponents with an average rank of 155.89 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 160.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Visker has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Visker has converted 38.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Visker 1 - 1 Nijboer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
650
Rank
650
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
483
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
64% (110-62)
Career Total W/L
57% (211-162)
73% (16-6)
YTD W/L
53% (9-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Niels Visker | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 30 | 33 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 2:56:35 | 2:56:35 |
1st Serve % | 56% (129/230) | 70% (155/223) |
1st Serve Win% | 61% (79/129) | 61% (94/155) |
2nd Serve Win% | 50% (51/101) | 53% (36/68) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (8/27) | 35% (9/26) |
Return Points W% | 42% (93/223) | 43% (100/230) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(5) 3-6 7-5 |
Niels Visker
Player
Ryan Nijboer
58%
(
72 of
125)
1st Serve %
75%
(
83 of
111)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
49 of
83)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
4-6 6-3 6-4 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Niels Visker
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
54%
(
57 of
105)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Niels Visker | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 73% (16/6) | 53% (9/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 70% (33/14) | 54% (21/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 54% (250/209) | 54% (205/176) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 73% (8/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 100% (2/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (6/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.9 | 0.49 |
Aces Total | 203 | 90 |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.39 |
DFs Total | 49 | 73 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:2 | 1:53:24 |
Avg Opp Rank | 147.09 | 188.18 |
1st Serve % | 65% (954/1467) | 55% (647/1167) |
1st Serve W% | 78% (744/954) | 72% (469/647) |
2nd Serve W% | 52% (264/512) | 52% (268/520) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (42/96) | 45% (59/132) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (483/1379) | 41% (505/1218) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
Futures W/L | 73% (16/6) | 64% (9/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (16/22) | 53% (9/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 90% (9/10) | 17% (1/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 40% (2/5) |
1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 78% (9/7) |
1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 22% (9/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
SF |
Evgeny Karlovskiy
Player
Niels Visker
66%
(
75 of
113)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
56 of
75)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Niels Visker
Player
Erik Arutiunian
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Niels Visker
Player
Sergey Fomin
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Niels Visker
Player
Max Batyutenko
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
11
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
100%
(
10 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
12%
(
5 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Marek Gengel
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Niels Visker
Player
Emile Hudd
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
91)
14
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
42 of
47)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
53 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
22 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
F |
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Ryan Nijboer
70%
(
51 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Karl Friberg
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Martin Landaluce
53%
(
60 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
76 of
126)
10
Aces
6
11
Double Faults
8
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
49%
(
26 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
39 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
51 of
126)
125
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Rafael Giotis
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Luka Mikrut
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more