Noah Lopez vs Vladislav Tasenkov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lopez vs Tasenkov analysis and find out who is favored!
Noah Lopez vs Vladislav Tasenkov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lopez has won 45.64% of points on his second serve, while Tasenkov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lopez, in recent form, has won 56.06% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tasenkov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lopez has saved 57.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tasenkov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lopez has won 62.34% of matches played (W/L 48/ 29), with Tasenkov winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lopez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 55/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Tasenkov has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Lopez has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.16% of matches (W/L 48/ 28), where as Tasenkov has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 2/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lopez winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Lopez winning 2 and Tasenkov winning 0. The last match between Lopez and Tasenkov was at the M15 Antalya, 12-12-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Noah Lopez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lopez and Tasenkov have played a deciding set 0 times, with Lopez winning 0 times and Tasenkov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lopez winning 0, and Tasenkov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lopez has played against opponents with an average rank of 124.77 while Tasenkov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lopez has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tasenkov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lopez has converted 52.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tasenkov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lopez 1 - 0 Tasenkov
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (123-96)
Career Total W/L
14% (7-44)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Noah Lopez | Vladislav Tasenkov |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Noah Lopez | Vladislav Tasenkov |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 62% (33/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 57% (286/217) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.03 | 0 |
Aces Total | 8 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 88.57 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 68% (414/606) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (259/414) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (87/192) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 53% (32/60) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (265/620) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Noah Lopez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Noah Lopez
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
68%
(
61 of
90)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
39%
(
22 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Noah Lopez
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kuzey Cekirge
Player
Noah Lopez
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 4-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Michael Zhu
Player
Noah Lopez
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-0 1-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Darwin Blanch
Player
Noah Lopez
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Vladislav Tasenkov Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more