Noah Schachter vs Keegan Smith Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 10:01 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Schachter vs K. Smith

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Schachter 0 - 1 Smith
They have played 2 sets in total, with Noah Schachter winning 0 and Keegan Smith winning 2. The last match between Keegan Smith and Noah Schachter was at the Charlottesville Challenger, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Keegan Smith getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schachter | 0 |
| Smith | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Charlottesville Challenger(10-26-25)
N. Schachter vs K. Smith H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $4,570 |
| 51.82% (128-119) | Career Total W/L | 62.28% (208-126) |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Schachter vs K. Smith Match Preview:
- Keegan Smith has recently shown stronger performance on their second serve, securing 47.34% of points compared to Noah Schachter's 41.92%.
- When it comes to returning their opponent's second serve, Noah Schachter surpasses Keegan Smith, with a win rate of 47.71% against Smith's 42.30%.
- In first serve returns, Schachter again leads slightly, winning 26.94% while Smith wins 23.84%.
- Under pressure, Smith is more resilient, saving 58.77% of breakpoints compared to Schachter's 47.19%.
- Smith has a higher win rate over the last year, standing at 63.64% against Schachter's 44.64%.
- Both players excel on hard courts, each holding a 65% win ratio. However, Smith struggles more on clay, while Schachter's weaker surface is indoor hard courts.
- Smith's participation in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events displays a higher success rate at 68.89% against Schachter's 47.37% in similar tournaments.
- Schachter has faced slightly tougher opponents on average, with an opponent ranking of 376.86 as compared to Smith's 400.67.
- In matches that reach a deciding set, Smith edges out slightly with a 53% win rate whereas Schachter has a 44% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Keegan Smith exhibits a more reliable second serve and displays greater resilience under pressure, key factors that could tilt the match in his favor. His superior breakpoint-saving ability suggests that he might better withstand critical moments during the match.
Noah Schachter, on the other hand, shows a proficiency in returning serves, which could challenge Smith, particularly if Schachter capitalizes on his slightly stronger return game. However, Smith’s overall match win percentage over the past year and his impressive performance in high-pressure deciding sets provide him with a significant edge.
Although both players share similar strengths on hard courts, Smith's ability to perform well in tournaments and his consistent performance under pressure make him the more favored player.
Given the comparative statistics and recent trends, Keegan Smith is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Noah Schachter vs Keegan Smith Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Schachter vs K. Smith H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 12 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:11:47 | Average Match Time | 1:11:47 |
| 48% (36/75) | 1st Serve % | 75% (42/56) |
| 81% (29/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (32/42) |
| 36% (14/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 0% (0/1) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 27% (15/56) | Return Points Win % | 43% (32/75) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Schachter Recent Matches Played
K. Smith Recent Matches Played

N. Schachter vs K. Smith Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.82% (128/119) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.28% (208/126) |
| 52.04% (293/270) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.18% (458/303) |
| 51.29% (2692/2557) | Games Win/Loss | 53.30% (3918/3433) |
| 55.13% (86/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.28% (173/92) |
| 47.62% (30/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (3/6) |
| 42.86% (12/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (32/28) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.53 |
| 770 | Aces Total | 1903 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 612 | Total Double Faults | 796 |
| 1:15:45 | Average Match Time | 1:26:7 |
| 354.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.93 |
| 60% (7245/12029) | 1st Serve % | 69% (14007/20228) |
| 68% (4957/7245) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (9984/14007) |
| 46% (2224/4784) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3190/6221) |
| 41% (478/1169) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (747/1861) |
| 40% (4734/11953) | Return Points Win % | 38% (7832/20757) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 39.47% (15/23) | Challenger W/L | 54.55% (78/65) |
| 54.07% (113/96) | Futures W/L | 68.62% (129/59) |
| 52% (127/245) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (206/332) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (24/43) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (62/114) |
| 46% (32/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (51/95) |
| 84% (131/110) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (208/184) |
| 16% (131/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (208/24) |
| 16% (116/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (126/24) |